Seek Returns logo

MP vs. VALE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MP and VALE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MP is a standard domestic listing, while VALE trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMPVALE
Company NameMP Materials Corp.Vale S.A.
CountryUnited StatesBrazil
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningMetals & Mining
Market Capitalization12.81 billion USD43.41 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 22, 2020March 21, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MP and VALE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MP vs. VALE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMPVALE
5-Day Price Return4.36%2.99%
13-Week Price Return260.11%0.87%
26-Week Price Return214.53%-1.58%
52-Week Price Return479.41%-4.21%
Month-to-Date Return17.58%2.49%
Year-to-Date Return363.53%0.44%
10-Day Avg. Volume11.05M21.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume13.51M20.83M
3-Month Volatility127.13%24.39%
Beta2.370.93

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MP

-9.73%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

MP has a negative Return on Equity of -9.73%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

VALE

13.93%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

VALE’s Return on Equity of 13.93% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MP vs. VALE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MP

-41.87%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

MP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -41.87%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

VALE

13.81%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

VALE’s Net Profit Margin of 13.81% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MP vs. VALE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MP

-64.23%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

MP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -64.23%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

VALE

20.82%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

VALE’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.82% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MP vs. VALE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMPVALE
Return on Equity (TTM)-9.73%13.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)-4.34%5.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-41.87%13.81%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-64.23%20.82%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)11.29%34.24%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MP

3.60

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

MP’s Current Ratio of 3.60 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VALE

1.22

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

VALE’s Current Ratio of 1.22 falls into the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MP vs. VALE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MP

0.93

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

MP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Metals & Mining industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VALE

0.45

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

VALE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MP vs. VALE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MP

59.83

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

MP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 59.83 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

VALE

2.82

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

VALE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.82 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MP vs. VALE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMPVALE
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.601.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.070.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.930.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)59.832.82

Growth

Revenue Growth

MP vs. VALE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MP vs. VALE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MP

0.00%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VALE

8.93%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 8.93%, VALE offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MP vs. VALE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MP

0.00%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

MP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VALE

94.22%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

VALE’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.22% is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MP vs. VALE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMPVALE
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%8.93%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%94.22%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MP

--

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for MP is currently unavailable.

VALE

7.85

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, VALE’s P/E Ratio of 7.85 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MP vs. VALE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MP

50.35

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

With a P/S Ratio of 50.35, MP trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Metals & Mining industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VALE

1.08

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

VALE’s P/S Ratio of 1.08 aligns with the market consensus for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MP vs. VALE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MP

5.38

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

At 5.38, MP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VALE

1.12

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

VALE’s P/B Ratio of 1.12 is within the conventional range for the Metals & Mining industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MP vs. VALE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Metals & Mining industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMPVALE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--7.85
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)50.351.08
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.381.12
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)121.7920.23