Seek Returns logo

MOS vs. SMG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MOS and SMG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMOSSMG
Company NameThe Mosaic CompanyThe Scotts Miracle-Gro Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryChemicalsChemicals
Market Capitalization10.33 billion USD3.66 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 26, 1988January 31, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MOS and SMG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MOS vs. SMG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMOSSMG
5-Day Price Return0.77%0.97%
13-Week Price Return-8.41%4.29%
26-Week Price Return20.02%-2.92%
52-Week Price Return16.58%-10.66%
Month-to-Date Return-9.61%1.21%
Year-to-Date Return32.42%-4.40%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.59M0.74M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.28M1.08M
3-Month Volatility37.33%40.21%
Beta1.031.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MOS

7.92%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

MOS’s Return on Equity of 7.92% is on par with the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SMG

-109.78%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

SMG has a negative Return on Equity of -109.78%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MOS vs. SMG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MOS

8.35%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

MOS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Chemicals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SMG

1.54%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

SMG’s Net Profit Margin of 1.54% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Chemicals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MOS vs. SMG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MOS

7.09%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

MOS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.09% is around the midpoint for the Chemicals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SMG

8.50%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

SMG’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.50% is around the midpoint for the Chemicals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MOS vs. SMG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMOSSMG
Return on Equity (TTM)7.92%-109.78%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.01%1.68%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.35%1.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.09%8.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)15.33%29.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MOS

1.14

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

MOS’s Current Ratio of 1.14 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SMG

1.61

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

SMG’s Current Ratio of 1.61 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MOS vs. SMG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MOS

0.35

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, MOS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.35 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SMG

22.85

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 22.85, SMG operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Chemicals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MOS vs. SMG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MOS

2.00

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, MOS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.00 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SMG

0.90

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

SMG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.90 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

MOS vs. SMG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMOSSMG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.141.61
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.390.78
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.3522.85
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.000.90

Growth

Revenue Growth

MOS vs. SMG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MOS vs. SMG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MOS

2.66%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

MOS’s Dividend Yield of 2.66% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SMG

4.30%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.30%, SMG offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Chemicals industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MOS vs. SMG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MOS

29.18%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

MOS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.18% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SMG

21.00%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

SMG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.00% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MOS vs. SMG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMOSSMG
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.66%4.30%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.18%21.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MOS

10.98

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, MOS’s P/E Ratio of 10.98 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SMG

67.40

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

At 67.40, SMG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MOS vs. SMG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MOS

0.92

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

MOS’s P/S Ratio of 0.92 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SMG

1.04

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

SMG’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MOS vs. SMG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MOS

0.93

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

MOS’s P/B Ratio of 0.93 is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SMG

26.87

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

At 26.87, SMG’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MOS vs. SMG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMOSSMG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.9867.40
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.921.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.9326.87
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.394.98