Seek Returns logo

MOS vs. RGLD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MOS and RGLD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMOSRGLD
Company NameThe Mosaic CompanyRoyal Gold, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryChemicalsMetals & Mining
Market Capitalization10.51 billion USD11.49 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 26, 1988June 9, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MOS and RGLD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MOS vs. RGLD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMOSRGLD
5-Day Price Return2.76%4.70%
13-Week Price Return-5.37%-1.23%
26-Week Price Return22.12%16.96%
52-Week Price Return19.17%25.69%
Month-to-Date Return-8.00%15.28%
Year-to-Date Return34.78%32.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.80M0.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.32M0.72M
3-Month Volatility37.52%29.77%
Beta1.030.40

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MOS

7.92%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

MOS’s Return on Equity of 7.92% is on par with the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RGLD

14.19%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

RGLD’s Return on Equity of 14.19% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MOS vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MOS

8.35%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

MOS’s Net Profit Margin of 8.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Chemicals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RGLD

56.22%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

RGLD’s Net Profit Margin of 56.22% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MOS vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MOS

7.09%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

MOS’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.09% is around the midpoint for the Chemicals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RGLD

64.70%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

RGLD’s Operating Profit Margin of 64.70% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

MOS vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMOSRGLD
Return on Equity (TTM)7.92%14.19%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.01%13.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.35%56.22%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.09%64.70%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)15.33%86.51%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MOS

1.14

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

MOS’s Current Ratio of 1.14 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RGLD

4.49

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

RGLD’s Current Ratio of 4.49 is in the upper quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MOS vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MOS

0.35

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, MOS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.35 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

RGLD

0.00

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, RGLD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MOS vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MOS

2.00

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, MOS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.00 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

RGLD

112.92

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 112.92, RGLD demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MOS vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMOSRGLD
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.144.49
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.394.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.350.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.00112.92

Growth

Revenue Growth

MOS vs. RGLD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MOS vs. RGLD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MOS

2.66%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

MOS’s Dividend Yield of 2.66% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RGLD

1.00%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RGLD’s Dividend Yield of 1.00% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MOS vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MOS

29.18%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

MOS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.18% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RGLD

24.89%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

RGLD’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.89% is within the typical range for the Metals & Mining industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MOS vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMOSRGLD
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.66%1.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.18%24.89%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MOS

10.98

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, MOS’s P/E Ratio of 10.98 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RGLD

24.77

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

RGLD’s P/E Ratio of 24.77 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MOS vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MOS

0.92

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

MOS’s P/S Ratio of 0.92 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RGLD

13.92

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

With a P/S Ratio of 13.92, RGLD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Metals & Mining industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MOS vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MOS

0.93

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

MOS’s P/B Ratio of 0.93 is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

RGLD

3.54

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

RGLD’s P/B Ratio of 3.54 is in the upper tier for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MOS vs. RGLD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Chemicals and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMOSRGLD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.9824.77
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.9213.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.933.54
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)27.3932.21