Seek Returns logo

MO vs. UL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MO and UL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MO is a standard domestic listing, while UL trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMOUL
Company NameAltria Group, Inc.Unilever PLC
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryTobaccoPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization111.36 billion USD146.74 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962March 25, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MO and UL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MO vs. UL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMOUL
5-Day Price Return1.43%-1.73%
13-Week Price Return12.67%-2.54%
26-Week Price Return14.39%-3.23%
52-Week Price Return29.40%-8.94%
Month-to-Date Return-1.71%-0.64%
Year-to-Date Return26.33%-3.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume8.81M2.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.44M2.11M
3-Month Volatility18.20%15.26%
Beta0.580.18

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MO

149.65%

Tobacco Industry

Max
49.48%
Q3
49.48%
Median
13.16%
Q1
5.02%
Min
4.04%

MO’s Return on Equity of 149.65% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UL

29.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
33.29%
Q3
19.04%
Median
10.69%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-10.45%

In the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, UL’s Return on Equity of 29.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MO vs. UL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MO

37.24%

Tobacco Industry

Max
21.36%
Q3
16.88%
Median
10.39%
Q1
7.51%
Min
4.74%

MO’s Net Profit Margin of 37.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

UL

9.29%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
10.84%
Median
9.29%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-0.14%

UL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MO vs. UL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MO

46.84%

Tobacco Industry

Max
18.53%
Q3
15.03%
Median
11.76%
Q1
11.00%
Min
6.94%

MO’s Operating Profit Margin of 46.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

UL

14.58%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.64%
Q3
16.46%
Median
12.80%
Q1
8.01%
Min
2.98%

UL’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.58% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MO vs. UL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMOUL
Return on Equity (TTM)149.65%29.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)25.57%7.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)37.24%9.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)46.84%14.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)61.41%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MO

0.39

Tobacco Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.84
Median
1.26
Q1
0.79
Min
0.39

MO’s Current Ratio of 0.39 falls into the lower quartile for the Tobacco industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UL

0.76

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.73
Median
1.76
Q1
1.16
Min
0.76

UL’s Current Ratio of 0.76 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MO vs. UL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MO

8.67

Tobacco Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
2.19
Median
0.58
Q1
0.07
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.67, MO operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Tobacco industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UL

1.80

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.80
Q3
0.78
Median
0.30
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

UL’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Personal Care Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MO vs. UL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MO

36.48

Tobacco Industry

Max
306.04
Q3
126.21
Median
9.35
Q1
6.32
Min
-11.45

MO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.48 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Tobacco industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UL

22.79

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-3.28

UL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.79 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MO vs. UL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMOUL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.390.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.240.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)8.671.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)36.4822.79

Growth

Revenue Growth

MO vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MO vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MO

6.23%

Tobacco Industry

Max
6.77%
Q3
6.12%
Median
5.06%
Q1
3.83%
Min
0.57%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.23%, MO offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Tobacco industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

UL

3.56%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
2.70%
Median
1.98%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.56%, UL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MO vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MO

78.29%

Tobacco Industry

Max
78.29%
Q3
75.97%
Median
64.37%
Q1
50.14%
Min
49.96%

MO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 78.29% is in the upper quartile for the Tobacco industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

UL

79.51%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
221.40%
Q3
137.27%
Median
70.48%
Q1
51.10%
Min
0.00%

UL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.51% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MO vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMOUL
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.23%3.56%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)78.29%79.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MO

12.57

Tobacco Industry

Max
44.17
Q3
36.23
Median
27.79
Q1
11.97
Min
9.91

MO’s P/E Ratio of 12.57 is within the middle range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UL

22.31

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
31.71
Median
22.50
Q1
20.20
Min
11.79

UL’s P/E Ratio of 22.31 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MO vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MO

4.68

Tobacco Industry

Max
7.60
Q3
5.15
Median
2.97
Q1
1.39
Min
0.80

MO’s P/S Ratio of 4.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UL

2.07

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
2.35
Median
1.92
Q1
1.18
Min
0.00

UL’s P/S Ratio of 2.07 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MO vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MO

27.09

Tobacco Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
4.76
Median
3.34
Q1
1.97
Min
1.05

At 27.09, MO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Tobacco industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UL

7.00

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
12.00
Q3
6.22
Median
2.84
Q1
1.70
Min
1.12

UL’s P/B Ratio of 7.00 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MO vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMOUL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.5722.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.682.07
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)27.097.00
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.6619.25