Seek Returns logo

MNST vs. UL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MNST and UL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MNST is a standard domestic listing, while UL trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMNSTUL
Company NameMonster Beverage CorporationUnilever PLC
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization60.83 billion USD153.37 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateDecember 9, 1985March 25, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MNST and UL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MNST vs. UL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMNSTUL
5-Day Price Return-2.64%3.26%
13-Week Price Return-0.91%-0.70%
26-Week Price Return20.53%7.42%
52-Week Price Return34.04%-3.70%
Month-to-Date Return6.04%5.76%
Year-to-Date Return18.53%2.51%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.08M2.07M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.79M2.37M
3-Month Volatility23.21%15.01%
Beta0.530.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MNST

24.73%

Beverages Industry

Max
49.46%
Q3
24.91%
Median
11.13%
Q1
5.27%
Min
-5.93%

MNST’s Return on Equity of 24.73% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UL

29.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

In the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, UL’s Return on Equity of 29.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MNST vs. UL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MNST

20.54%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.86%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.70%
Q1
5.33%
Min
-4.40%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.54% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UL

9.29%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

UL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MNST vs. UL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MNST

26.93%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
18.25%
Median
13.42%
Q1
10.58%
Min
0.71%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.93% places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UL

14.58%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

UL’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.58% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MNST vs. UL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMNSTUL
Return on Equity (TTM)24.73%29.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.23%7.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)20.54%9.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.93%14.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)55.18%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MNST

3.52

Beverages Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
1.97
Median
1.21
Q1
0.86
Min
0.53

MNST’s Current Ratio of 3.52 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Beverages industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

UL

0.76

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

UL’s Current Ratio of 0.76 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MNST vs. UL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MNST

0.00

Beverages Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.23
Median
0.79
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry, MNST’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

UL

1.80

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.80, UL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MNST vs. UL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MNST

123.81

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
40.67
Median
9.62
Q1
3.59
Min
0.81

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 123.81, MNST demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Beverages industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

UL

22.79

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

UL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.79 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MNST vs. UL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMNSTUL
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.520.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.860.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.001.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)123.8122.79

Growth

Revenue Growth

MNST vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MNST vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
6.93%
Q3
4.51%
Median
3.09%
Q1
2.03%
Min
0.00%

MNST currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UL

3.42%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.42%, UL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MNST vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MNST

0.00%

Beverages Industry

Max
143.36%
Q3
99.22%
Median
67.03%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

MNST has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UL

79.51%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

UL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.51% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MNST vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMNSTUL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%79.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MNST

40.32

Beverages Industry

Max
41.48
Q3
28.35
Median
19.09
Q1
15.36
Min
3.14

A P/E Ratio of 40.32 places MNST in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UL

23.23

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

UL’s P/E Ratio of 23.23 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MNST vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MNST

8.28

Beverages Industry

Max
3.90
Q3
2.38
Median
1.54
Q1
0.84
Min
0.41

With a P/S Ratio of 8.28, MNST trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Beverages industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

UL

2.16

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

UL’s P/S Ratio of 2.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MNST vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MNST

8.49

Beverages Industry

Max
6.29
Q3
3.58
Median
2.19
Q1
1.68
Min
0.91

At 8.49, MNST’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Beverages industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UL

7.06

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

UL’s P/B Ratio of 7.06 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MNST vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMNSTUL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)40.3223.23
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.282.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.497.06
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)34.2020.05