Seek Returns logo

MMS vs. RTO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMS and RTO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MMS is a standard domestic listing, while RTO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMMSRTO
Company NameMaximus, Inc.Rentokil Initial plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization4.80 billion USD12.40 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 13, 1997November 18, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMS and RTO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMS vs. RTO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMSRTO
5-Day Price Return0.92%-2.47%
13-Week Price Return13.44%3.18%
26-Week Price Return26.51%-12.52%
52-Week Price Return-4.33%-24.83%
Month-to-Date Return15.45%-4.27%
Year-to-Date Return14.23%-9.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.77M3.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.48M4.20M
3-Month Volatility26.70%31.78%
Beta0.560.93

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMS

18.25%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

MMS’s Return on Equity of 18.25% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RTO

6.17%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

RTO’s Return on Equity of 6.17% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MMS vs. RTO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMS

5.83%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

MMS’s Net Profit Margin of 5.83% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RTO

5.49%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

RTO’s Net Profit Margin of 5.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MMS vs. RTO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMS

9.53%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

MMS’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.53% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RTO

9.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

RTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.93% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MMS vs. RTO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMSRTO
Return on Equity (TTM)18.25%6.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.51%2.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.83%5.49%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.53%9.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)23.98%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMS

2.27

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

MMS’s Current Ratio of 2.27 is in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

RTO

1.12

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

RTO’s Current Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMS vs. RTO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMS

0.93

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

MMS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RTO

1.14

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

RTO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.14. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MMS vs. RTO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMS

5.93

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

MMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.93 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RTO

5.22

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

RTO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMS vs. RTO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMSRTO
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.271.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.171.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.931.14
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.935.22

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMS vs. RTO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMS vs. RTO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMS

1.46%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

MMS’s Dividend Yield of 1.46% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RTO

3.44%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

RTO’s Dividend Yield of 3.44% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

MMS vs. RTO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMS

22.11%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

MMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.11% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RTO

93.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

RTO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 93.97% is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MMS vs. RTO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMSRTO
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.46%3.44%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.11%93.97%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMS

15.14

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, MMS’s P/E Ratio of 15.14 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RTO

27.30

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

RTO’s P/E Ratio of 27.30 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMS vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMS

0.88

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

MMS’s P/S Ratio of 0.88 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RTO

1.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

RTO’s P/S Ratio of 1.50 aligns with the market consensus for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MMS vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMS

2.23

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

MMS’s P/B Ratio of 2.23 is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

RTO

1.69

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

RTO’s P/B Ratio of 1.69 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MMS vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMSRTO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.1427.30
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.881.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.231.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.8713.32