Seek Returns logo

MMM vs. ZTO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMM and ZTO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MMM is a standard domestic listing, while ZTO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMMMZTO
Company Name3M CompanyZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryIndustrial ConglomeratesAir Freight & Logistics
Market Capitalization83.09 billion USD14.90 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962October 27, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMM and ZTO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMM vs. ZTO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMMZTO
5-Day Price Return-1.76%-1.42%
13-Week Price Return0.01%3.86%
26-Week Price Return11.64%-5.28%
52-Week Price Return15.68%2.50%
Month-to-Date Return0.53%-1.42%
Year-to-Date Return20.85%-3.90%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.34M1.44M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.13M2.51M
3-Month Volatility23.16%37.56%
Beta1.070.76

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
13.64%
Median
9.41%
Q1
5.80%
Min
-3.73%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ZTO

13.99%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.63%
Median
11.99%
Q1
7.41%
Min
2.11%

ZTO’s Return on Equity of 13.99% is on par with the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MMM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
26.43%
Q3
13.08%
Median
9.39%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-2.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ZTO

18.81%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
5.98%
Median
4.11%
Q1
2.45%
Min
0.50%

ZTO’s Net Profit Margin of 18.81% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MMM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
27.02%
Q3
17.23%
Median
12.90%
Q1
8.32%
Min
-3.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ZTO

23.34%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
11.33%
Q3
8.19%
Median
5.82%
Q1
3.63%
Min
1.06%

ZTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 23.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

MMM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMMZTO
Return on Equity (TTM)91.40%13.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.93%9.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%18.81%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.46%23.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.11%27.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.40
Q3
1.69
Median
1.35
Q1
1.14
Min
0.56

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ZTO

1.21

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.73
Q3
1.33
Median
1.15
Q1
0.95
Min
0.61

ZTO’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.49
Median
0.91
Q1
0.63
Min
0.24

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ZTO

0.29

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.25
Median
0.77
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, ZTO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MMM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
19.80
Q3
10.68
Median
4.59
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ZTO

--

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.92
Q1
6.34
Min
-0.60

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ZTO is currently unavailable.

MMM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMMZTO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.721.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.121.02
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.060.29
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-15.31--

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMM vs. ZTO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMM vs. ZTO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
9.82%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.09%
Q1
1.67%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial Conglomerates industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

ZTO

0.00%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.20%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.55%
Min
0.00%

ZTO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MMM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
182.48%
Q3
97.89%
Median
55.48%
Q1
31.63%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ZTO

0.00%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
60.17%
Q1
4.60%
Min
0.00%

ZTO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MMM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMMZTO
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.88%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.27%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMM

20.94

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
45.17
Q3
25.68
Median
15.16
Q1
8.58
Min
0.79

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.94 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ZTO

12.24

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
30.08
Q3
23.03
Median
18.40
Q1
12.84
Min
5.90

In the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, ZTO’s P/E Ratio of 12.24 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MMM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.15
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.09

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ZTO

2.30

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.40
Median
0.63
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 2.30, ZTO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MMM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
5.44
Q3
2.68
Median
0.97
Q1
0.52
Min
0.04

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ZTO

1.59

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
5.68
Q3
3.23
Median
1.97
Q1
1.31
Min
0.80

ZTO’s P/B Ratio of 1.59 is within the conventional range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MMM vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMMZTO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.9412.24
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.352.30
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.901.59
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.8810.20