Seek Returns logo

MMM vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMM and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMMMVRSK
Company Name3M CompanyVerisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryIndustrial ConglomeratesProfessional Services
Market Capitalization83.09 billion USD34.87 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962October 7, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMM and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMM vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMMVRSK
5-Day Price Return0.38%3.52%
13-Week Price Return1.93%-19.26%
26-Week Price Return1.64%-13.88%
52-Week Price Return13.02%-4.82%
Month-to-Date Return-0.23%-6.20%
Year-to-Date Return20.21%-8.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.68M1.49M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.18M1.05M
3-Month Volatility22.89%22.69%
Beta1.050.86

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
13.64%
Median
9.41%
Q1
5.80%
Min
-3.73%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VRSK

439.17%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 439.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MMM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
26.43%
Q3
13.08%
Median
9.39%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-2.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRSK

30.67%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

A Net Profit Margin of 30.67% places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MMM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
27.02%
Q3
17.23%
Median
12.90%
Q1
8.32%
Min
-3.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VRSK

43.94%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

MMM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMMVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)91.40%439.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.93%19.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%30.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.46%43.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.11%69.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.40
Q3
1.69
Median
1.35
Q1
1.14
Min
0.56

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

VRSK

1.53

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.49
Median
0.91
Q1
0.63
Min
0.24

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

VRSK

10.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.43, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MMM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
19.80
Q3
10.68
Median
4.59
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MMM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMMVRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.721.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.121.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.0610.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-15.3143.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMM vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMM vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMM

1.86%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
9.82%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.09%
Q1
1.67%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.86% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial Conglomerates industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRSK

0.68%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
182.48%
Q3
97.89%
Median
55.48%
Q1
31.63%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRSK

25.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.76% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMMVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.86%0.68%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.27%25.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMM

21.10

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
45.17
Q3
25.68
Median
15.16
Q1
8.58
Min
0.79

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 21.10 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VRSK

37.93

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

A P/E Ratio of 37.93 places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MMM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMM

3.38

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.15
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.09

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.38 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VRSK

11.64

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

With a P/S Ratio of 11.64, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MMM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
5.44
Q3
2.68
Median
0.97
Q1
0.52
Min
0.04

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VRSK

139.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

At 139.79, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MMM vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMMVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.1037.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.3811.64
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.90139.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)31.1134.05