Seek Returns logo

MMM vs. URI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMM and URI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMMMURI
Company Name3M CompanyUnited Rentals, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryIndustrial ConglomeratesTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization83.01 billion USD60.45 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962December 18, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMM and URI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMM vs. URI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMMURI
5-Day Price Return0.98%2.60%
13-Week Price Return4.05%33.51%
26-Week Price Return3.76%32.45%
52-Week Price Return21.19%31.02%
Month-to-Date Return4.44%6.40%
Year-to-Date Return20.73%33.37%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.99M0.50M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.40M0.57M
3-Month Volatility23.22%31.00%
Beta1.041.75

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
14.23%
Median
7.81%
Q1
5.91%
Min
-3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

URI

28.97%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

In the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, URI’s Return on Equity of 28.97% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MMM vs. URI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
18.70%
Q3
12.58%
Median
9.26%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

URI

16.11%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.11% places URI in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MMM vs. URI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
25.69%
Q3
17.03%
Median
12.85%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

URI

25.50%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.50% places URI in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MMM vs. URI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMMURI
Return on Equity (TTM)91.40%28.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.93%8.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%16.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.46%25.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.11%39.21%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.64
Median
1.38
Q1
1.13
Min
0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

URI

0.86

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

URI’s Current Ratio of 0.86 falls into the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MMM vs. URI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.47
Median
0.99
Q1
0.66
Min
0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

URI

1.48

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

URI’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MMM vs. URI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
11.17
Q3
8.02
Median
5.88
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

URI

5.90

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

URI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.90 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM vs. URI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMMURI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.720.86
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.120.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.061.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-15.315.90

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMM vs. URI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMM vs. URI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.17%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.14%
Q1
1.88%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

URI

0.78%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

URI’s Dividend Yield of 0.78% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MMM vs. URI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
181.91%
Q3
95.57%
Median
50.60%
Q1
35.01%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

URI

17.74%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

URI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.74% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MMM vs. URI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMMURI
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.88%0.78%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.27%17.74%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMM

20.92

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
36.98
Q3
22.09
Median
12.18
Q1
8.93
Min
5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.92 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

URI

22.88

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

URI’s P/E Ratio of 22.88 is within the middle range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM vs. URI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.60
Q3
2.10
Median
0.68
Q1
0.42
Min
0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

URI

3.68

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

URI’s P/S Ratio of 3.68 is in the upper echelon for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MMM vs. URI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.89
Q3
2.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.60
Min
0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

URI

5.42

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

URI’s P/B Ratio of 5.42 is in the upper tier for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MMM vs. URI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMMURI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.9222.88
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.353.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.905.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.8655.53