Seek Returns logo

MMM vs. UPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMM and UPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMMMUPS
Company Name3M CompanyUnited Parcel Service, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryIndustrial ConglomeratesAir Freight & Logistics
Market Capitalization83.09 billion USD73.10 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962November 10, 1999
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMM and UPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMM vs. UPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMMUPS
5-Day Price Return-1.76%0.79%
13-Week Price Return0.01%-15.57%
26-Week Price Return11.64%-13.85%
52-Week Price Return15.68%-34.26%
Month-to-Date Return0.53%3.26%
Year-to-Date Return20.85%-31.60%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.34M7.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.13M7.21M
3-Month Volatility23.16%28.61%
Beta1.071.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
13.64%
Median
9.41%
Q1
5.80%
Min
-3.73%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UPS

35.27%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.63%
Median
11.99%
Q1
7.41%
Min
2.11%

In the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, UPS’s Return on Equity of 35.27% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MMM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
26.43%
Q3
13.08%
Median
9.39%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-2.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UPS

6.34%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
5.98%
Median
4.11%
Q1
2.45%
Min
0.50%

A Net Profit Margin of 6.34% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MMM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
27.02%
Q3
17.23%
Median
12.90%
Q1
8.32%
Min
-3.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UPS

9.30%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
11.33%
Q3
8.19%
Median
5.82%
Q1
3.63%
Min
1.06%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.30% places UPS in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MMM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMMUPS
Return on Equity (TTM)91.40%35.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.93%8.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%6.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.46%9.30%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.11%81.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.40
Q3
1.69
Median
1.35
Q1
1.14
Min
0.56

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

UPS

1.32

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.73
Q3
1.33
Median
1.15
Q1
0.95
Min
0.61

UPS’s Current Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the median group of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.49
Median
0.91
Q1
0.63
Min
0.24

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UPS

1.57

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.25
Median
0.77
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

UPS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Air Freight & Logistics industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.57. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MMM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
19.80
Q3
10.68
Median
4.59
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

UPS

9.59

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.92
Q1
6.34
Min
-0.60

UPS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMMUPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.721.32
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.121.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.061.57
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-15.319.59

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMM vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMM vs. UPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
9.82%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.09%
Q1
1.67%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial Conglomerates industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UPS

7.33%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.20%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.55%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Yield of 7.33% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

MMM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
182.48%
Q3
97.89%
Median
55.48%
Q1
31.63%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UPS

94.15%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
60.17%
Q1
4.60%
Min
0.00%

UPS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 94.15% is in the upper quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MMM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMMUPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.88%7.33%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.27%94.15%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMM

20.94

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
45.17
Q3
25.68
Median
15.16
Q1
8.58
Min
0.79

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.94 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UPS

12.85

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
30.08
Q3
23.03
Median
18.40
Q1
12.84
Min
5.90

UPS’s P/E Ratio of 12.85 is within the middle range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.15
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.09

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UPS

0.82

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.40
Median
0.63
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

UPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.82 aligns with the market consensus for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MMM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
5.44
Q3
2.68
Median
0.97
Q1
0.52
Min
0.04

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UPS

5.43

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
5.68
Q3
3.23
Median
1.97
Q1
1.31
Min
0.80

UPS’s P/B Ratio of 5.43 is in the upper tier for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MMM vs. UPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMMUPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.9412.85
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.350.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.905.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.8813.70