Seek Returns logo

MMM vs. UHAL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMM and UHAL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMMMUHAL
Company Name3M CompanyU-Haul Holding Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryIndustrial ConglomeratesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization85.33 billion USD10.22 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962November 4, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMM and UHAL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMM vs. UHAL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMMUHAL
5-Day Price Return5.58%1.04%
13-Week Price Return6.57%-11.47%
26-Week Price Return5.17%-16.29%
52-Week Price Return29.86%-12.43%
Month-to-Date Return7.36%2.06%
Year-to-Date Return24.10%-14.53%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.24M0.13M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.62M0.12M
3-Month Volatility25.27%24.80%
Beta1.051.21

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
14.23%
Median
7.81%
Q1
5.91%
Min
-3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UHAL

4.89%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UHAL’s Return on Equity of 4.89% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MMM vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
18.70%
Q3
12.58%
Median
9.26%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UHAL

6.30%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

UHAL’s Net Profit Margin of 6.30% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MMM vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
25.69%
Q3
17.03%
Median
12.85%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UHAL

12.28%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UHAL’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.28% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MMM vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMMUHAL
Return on Equity (TTM)91.40%4.89%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.93%1.83%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%6.30%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.46%12.28%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.11%36.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.64
Median
1.38
Q1
1.13
Min
0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

UHAL

0.80

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UHAL’s Current Ratio of 0.80 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMM vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.47
Median
0.99
Q1
0.66
Min
0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UHAL

0.96

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

UHAL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.96 is typical for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MMM vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
11.17
Q3
8.02
Median
5.88
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

UHAL

3.02

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UHAL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.02 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMMUHAL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.720.80
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.120.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.060.96
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-15.313.02

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMM vs. UHAL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMM vs. UHAL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMM

1.83%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.17%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.14%
Q1
1.88%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.83% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

UHAL

0.33%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UHAL’s Dividend Yield of 0.33% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MMM vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
181.91%
Q3
95.57%
Median
50.60%
Q1
35.01%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UHAL

5.89%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UHAL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.89% is in the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MMM vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMMUHAL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.83%0.33%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.27%5.89%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMM

21.41

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
36.98
Q3
22.09
Median
12.18
Q1
8.93
Min
5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 21.41 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UHAL

28.80

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

A P/E Ratio of 28.80 places UHAL in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MMM vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMM

3.43

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.60
Q3
2.10
Median
0.68
Q1
0.42
Min
0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.43 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UHAL

1.81

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

UHAL’s P/S Ratio of 1.81 aligns with the market consensus for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MMM vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.89
Q3
2.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.60
Min
0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UHAL

1.56

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

UHAL’s P/B Ratio of 1.56 is within the conventional range for the Ground Transportation industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MMM vs. UHAL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMMUHAL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.4128.80
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.431.81
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.901.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)31.5753.16