Seek Returns logo

MMM vs. SWK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMM and SWK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMMMSWK
Company Name3M CompanyStanley Black & Decker, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryIndustrial ConglomeratesMachinery
Market Capitalization82.42 billion USD11.44 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMM and SWK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMM vs. SWK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMMSWK
5-Day Price Return-1.21%-0.67%
13-Week Price Return0.40%4.67%
26-Week Price Return4.05%-14.85%
52-Week Price Return21.77%-24.07%
Month-to-Date Return3.71%9.27%
Year-to-Date Return19.88%-7.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.22M1.72M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.45M2.53M
3-Month Volatility23.14%35.85%
Beta1.041.19

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
14.23%
Median
7.81%
Q1
5.91%
Min
-3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

SWK

6.59%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

SWK’s Return on Equity of 6.59% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MMM vs. SWK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
18.70%
Q3
12.58%
Median
9.26%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SWK

3.85%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SWK’s Net Profit Margin of 3.85% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MMM vs. SWK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
25.69%
Q3
17.03%
Median
12.85%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

SWK

4.70%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

SWK’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.70% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MMM vs. SWK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMMSWK
Return on Equity (TTM)91.40%6.59%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.93%2.63%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%3.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.46%4.70%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.11%30.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.64
Median
1.38
Q1
1.13
Min
0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

SWK

1.04

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

SWK’s Current Ratio of 1.04 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MMM vs. SWK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.47
Median
0.99
Q1
0.66
Min
0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

SWK

0.74

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

SWK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.74 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MMM vs. SWK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
11.17
Q3
8.02
Median
5.88
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SWK

1.75

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SWK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.75 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MMM vs. SWK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMMSWK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.721.04
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.120.29
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.060.74
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-15.311.75

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMM vs. SWK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMM vs. SWK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.17%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.14%
Q1
1.88%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

SWK

7.39%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

SWK’s Dividend Yield of 7.39% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Machinery industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

MMM vs. SWK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
181.91%
Q3
95.57%
Median
50.60%
Q1
35.01%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SWK

148.38%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

SWK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 148.38% is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MMM vs. SWK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMMSWK
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.88%7.39%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.27%148.38%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMM

20.92

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
36.98
Q3
22.09
Median
12.18
Q1
8.93
Min
5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.92 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SWK

20.08

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

SWK’s P/E Ratio of 20.08 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM vs. SWK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.60
Q3
2.10
Median
0.68
Q1
0.42
Min
0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

SWK

0.77

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SWK’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MMM vs. SWK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.89
Q3
2.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.60
Min
0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

SWK

1.16

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

SWK’s P/B Ratio of 1.16 is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MMM vs. SWK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMMSWK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.9220.08
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.350.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.901.16
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.867.08