Seek Returns logo

MMM vs. STN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMM and STN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMMMSTN
Company Name3M CompanyStantec Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryIndustrial ConglomeratesConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization83.09 billion USD12.43 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962August 5, 2005
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMM and STN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMM vs. STN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMMSTN
5-Day Price Return0.38%0.75%
13-Week Price Return1.93%-0.08%
26-Week Price Return1.64%25.47%
52-Week Price Return13.02%38.00%
Month-to-Date Return-0.23%0.54%
Year-to-Date Return20.21%33.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.68M0.45M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.18M0.29M
3-Month Volatility22.89%19.69%
Beta1.050.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
13.64%
Median
9.41%
Q1
5.80%
Min
-3.73%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

STN

15.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

STN’s Return on Equity of 15.34% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MMM vs. STN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
26.43%
Q3
13.08%
Median
9.39%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-2.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

STN

7.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.10% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MMM vs. STN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
27.02%
Q3
17.23%
Median
12.90%
Q1
8.32%
Min
-3.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

STN

9.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

STN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.22% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MMM vs. STN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMMSTN
Return on Equity (TTM)91.40%15.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.93%6.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%7.10%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.46%9.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.11%54.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.40
Q3
1.69
Median
1.35
Q1
1.14
Min
0.56

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

STN

1.29

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

STN’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMM vs. STN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.49
Median
0.91
Q1
0.63
Min
0.24

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

STN

0.69

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

STN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MMM vs. STN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
19.80
Q3
10.68
Median
4.59
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

STN

60.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 60.60, STN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MMM vs. STN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMMSTN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.721.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.121.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.060.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-15.3160.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMM vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMM vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMM

1.86%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
9.82%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.09%
Q1
1.67%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.86% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial Conglomerates industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

STN

0.57%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Yield of 0.57% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
182.48%
Q3
97.89%
Median
55.48%
Q1
31.63%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

STN

22.30%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.30% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMMSTN
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.86%0.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.27%22.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMM

21.10

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
45.17
Q3
25.68
Median
15.16
Q1
8.58
Min
0.79

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 21.10 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

STN

39.20

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

A P/E Ratio of 39.20 places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MMM vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMM

3.38

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.15
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.09

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.38 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

STN

2.78

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

STN’s P/S Ratio of 2.78 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MMM vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
5.44
Q3
2.68
Median
0.97
Q1
0.52
Min
0.04

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

STN

4.38

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

STN’s P/B Ratio of 4.38 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MMM vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMMSTN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.1039.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.382.78
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.904.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)31.1127.29