Seek Returns logo

MMM vs. RTO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMM and RTO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MMM is a standard domestic listing, while RTO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMMMRTO
Company Name3M CompanyRentokil Initial plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryIndustrial ConglomeratesCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization83.09 billion USD12.80 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962November 18, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMM and RTO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMM vs. RTO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMMRTO
5-Day Price Return0.38%4.83%
13-Week Price Return1.93%7.71%
26-Week Price Return1.64%6.25%
52-Week Price Return13.02%4.25%
Month-to-Date Return-0.23%0.43%
Year-to-Date Return20.21%-5.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.68M5.25M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.18M3.65M
3-Month Volatility22.89%31.04%
Beta1.051.00

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
13.64%
Median
9.41%
Q1
5.80%
Min
-3.73%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RTO

6.17%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

RTO’s Return on Equity of 6.17% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MMM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
26.43%
Q3
13.08%
Median
9.39%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-2.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RTO

5.49%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

RTO’s Net Profit Margin of 5.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MMM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
27.02%
Q3
17.23%
Median
12.90%
Q1
8.32%
Min
-3.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RTO

9.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

RTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.93% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MMM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMMRTO
Return on Equity (TTM)91.40%6.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.93%2.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%5.49%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.46%9.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.11%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.40
Q3
1.69
Median
1.35
Q1
1.14
Min
0.56

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

RTO

1.12

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

RTO’s Current Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.49
Median
0.91
Q1
0.63
Min
0.24

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

RTO

1.14

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

RTO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.14. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MMM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
19.80
Q3
10.68
Median
4.59
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

RTO

5.22

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

RTO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMMRTO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.721.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.121.03
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.061.14
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-15.315.22

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMM vs. RTO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMM vs. RTO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMM

1.86%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
9.82%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.09%
Q1
1.67%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.86% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial Conglomerates industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RTO

2.47%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.47%, RTO offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MMM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
182.48%
Q3
97.89%
Median
55.48%
Q1
31.63%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RTO

93.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

RTO’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 93.97% is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MMM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMMRTO
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.86%2.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.27%93.97%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMM

21.10

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
45.17
Q3
25.68
Median
15.16
Q1
8.58
Min
0.79

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 21.10 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RTO

38.00

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

A P/E Ratio of 38.00 places RTO in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MMM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMM

3.38

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.15
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.09

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.38 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RTO

2.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

RTO’s P/S Ratio of 2.09 aligns with the market consensus for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MMM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
5.44
Q3
2.68
Median
0.97
Q1
0.52
Min
0.04

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RTO

2.27

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

RTO’s P/B Ratio of 2.27 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MMM vs. RTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMMRTO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.1038.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.382.09
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.902.27
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)31.1118.55