Seek Returns logo

MMM vs. RSG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMM and RSG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMMMRSG
Company Name3M CompanyRepublic Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryIndustrial ConglomeratesCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization82.42 billion USD73.72 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962July 1, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMM and RSG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMM vs. RSG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMMRSG
5-Day Price Return-1.21%1.55%
13-Week Price Return0.40%-5.70%
26-Week Price Return4.05%5.18%
52-Week Price Return21.77%15.20%
Month-to-Date Return3.71%2.37%
Year-to-Date Return19.88%17.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.22M1.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.45M1.35M
3-Month Volatility23.14%18.33%
Beta1.040.62

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
14.23%
Median
7.81%
Q1
5.91%
Min
-3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

RSG

18.34%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.03%
Median
9.43%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-9.69%

In the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, RSG’s Return on Equity of 18.34% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MMM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
18.70%
Q3
12.58%
Median
9.26%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RSG

12.98%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
17.53%
Q3
9.01%
Median
5.20%
Q1
2.75%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.98% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MMM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
25.69%
Q3
17.03%
Median
12.85%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

RSG

20.24%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.43%
Q3
12.19%
Median
8.10%
Q1
3.18%
Min
-6.03%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.24% places RSG in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MMM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMMRSG
Return on Equity (TTM)91.40%18.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.93%6.50%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%12.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.46%20.24%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.11%42.28%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.64
Median
1.38
Q1
1.13
Min
0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

RSG

0.66

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
1.89
Median
1.38
Q1
0.87
Min
0.53

RSG’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MMM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.47
Median
0.99
Q1
0.66
Min
0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

RSG

1.08

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
1.67
Q3
1.08
Median
0.73
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

RSG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.08 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MMM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
11.17
Q3
8.02
Median
5.88
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

RSG

4.10

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
12.37
Median
7.16
Q1
2.69
Min
-10.97

RSG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.10 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMMRSG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.720.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.120.60
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.061.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-15.314.10

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMM vs. RSG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMM vs. RSG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.17%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.14%
Q1
1.88%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

RSG

0.96%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.44%
Q3
2.30%
Median
1.37%
Q1
0.63%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Yield of 0.96% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
181.91%
Q3
95.57%
Median
50.60%
Q1
35.01%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RSG

33.52%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
72.93%
Median
40.45%
Q1
23.31%
Min
0.00%

RSG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.52% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMMRSG
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.88%0.96%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.27%33.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMM

20.92

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
36.98
Q3
22.09
Median
12.18
Q1
8.93
Min
5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.92 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RSG

34.91

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.20
Q3
37.10
Median
22.38
Q1
16.35
Min
0.00

RSG’s P/E Ratio of 34.91 is within the middle range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.60
Q3
2.10
Median
0.68
Q1
0.42
Min
0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

RSG

4.53

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.64
Q3
2.28
Median
0.97
Q1
0.64
Min
0.00

RSG’s P/S Ratio of 4.53 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MMM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.89
Q3
2.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.60
Min
0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RSG

6.40

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.71
Q3
4.38
Median
2.39
Q1
1.57
Min
0.43

RSG’s P/B Ratio of 6.40 is in the upper tier for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MMM vs. RSG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMMRSG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.9234.91
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.354.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.906.40
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.8631.49