Seek Returns logo

MMM vs. ROP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMM and ROP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMMMROP
Company Name3M CompanyRoper Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIndustrial ConglomeratesSoftware
Market Capitalization82.42 billion USD58.17 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962February 13, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMM and ROP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMM vs. ROP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMMROP
5-Day Price Return-1.21%2.96%
13-Week Price Return0.40%-6.88%
26-Week Price Return4.05%-5.74%
52-Week Price Return21.77%-1.70%
Month-to-Date Return3.71%-1.80%
Year-to-Date Return19.88%3.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.22M0.77M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.45M0.58M
3-Month Volatility23.14%14.57%
Beta1.041.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
14.23%
Median
7.81%
Q1
5.91%
Min
-3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

ROP

8.08%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

ROP’s Return on Equity of 8.08% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MMM vs. ROP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
18.70%
Q3
12.58%
Median
9.26%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

ROP

20.62%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.62% places ROP in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MMM vs. ROP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
25.69%
Q3
17.03%
Median
12.85%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

ROP

28.06%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.06% places ROP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MMM vs. ROP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMMROP
Return on Equity (TTM)91.40%8.08%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.93%4.83%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%20.62%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.46%28.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.11%68.87%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.64
Median
1.38
Q1
1.13
Min
0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

ROP

0.46

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

ROP’s Current Ratio of 0.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MMM vs. ROP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.47
Median
0.99
Q1
0.66
Min
0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

ROP

0.45

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

ROP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MMM vs. ROP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
11.17
Q3
8.02
Median
5.88
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

ROP

80.97

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 80.97, ROP demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MMM vs. ROP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMMROP
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.720.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.120.43
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.060.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-15.3180.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMM vs. ROP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMM vs. ROP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.17%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.14%
Q1
1.88%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

ROP

0.58%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

ROP’s Dividend Yield of 0.58% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

MMM vs. ROP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
181.91%
Q3
95.57%
Median
50.60%
Q1
35.01%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ROP

21.99%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 21.99%, ROP’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

MMM vs. ROP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMMROP
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.88%0.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.27%21.99%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMM

20.92

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
36.98
Q3
22.09
Median
12.18
Q1
8.93
Min
5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.92 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

ROP

37.65

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

ROP’s P/E Ratio of 37.65 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.60
Q3
2.10
Median
0.68
Q1
0.42
Min
0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

ROP

7.76

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

ROP’s P/S Ratio of 7.76 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MMM vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.89
Q3
2.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.60
Min
0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

ROP

3.10

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

ROP’s P/B Ratio of 3.10 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MMM vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMMROP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.9237.65
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.357.76
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.903.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.8625.39