Seek Returns logo

MMM vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMM and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MMM is a standard domestic listing, while PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMMMPAC
Company Name3M CompanyGrupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
CountryUnited StatesMexico
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryIndustrial ConglomeratesTransportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization84.51 billion USD11.64 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962February 27, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMM and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMM vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMMPAC
5-Day Price Return2.97%-6.14%
13-Week Price Return3.74%-1.11%
26-Week Price Return8.03%13.10%
52-Week Price Return17.15%30.13%
Month-to-Date Return2.24%-1.14%
Year-to-Date Return22.91%16.76%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.36M0.86M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.18M0.71M
3-Month Volatility23.09%22.26%
Beta1.071.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
13.64%
Median
9.41%
Q1
5.80%
Min
-3.73%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PAC

42.80%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
25.25%
Q3
15.14%
Median
10.37%
Q1
6.63%
Min
1.67%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 42.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MMM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
26.43%
Q3
13.08%
Median
9.39%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-2.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PAC

23.19%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
56.87%
Q3
32.94%
Median
20.37%
Q1
11.21%
Min
1.22%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 23.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MMM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
27.02%
Q3
17.23%
Median
12.90%
Q1
8.32%
Min
-3.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PAC

42.29%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
60.60%
Q3
46.73%
Median
31.03%
Q1
15.90%
Min
1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.29% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MMM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMMPAC
Return on Equity (TTM)91.40%42.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.93%11.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%23.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.46%42.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.11%100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.40
Q3
1.69
Median
1.35
Q1
1.14
Min
0.56

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

PAC

0.93

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
2.90
Q3
1.82
Median
1.16
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

PAC’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MMM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.49
Median
0.91
Q1
0.63
Min
0.24

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

PAC

2.48

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.23
Q3
1.64
Median
0.83
Q1
0.27
Min
0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MMM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
19.80
Q3
10.68
Median
4.59
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
29.26
Q3
20.45
Median
7.97
Q1
4.97
Min
2.01

PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMMPAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.720.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.120.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.062.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-15.315.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMM vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMM vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMM

1.83%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
9.82%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.09%
Q1
1.67%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.83% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial Conglomerates industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PAC

2.55%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
8.64%
Q3
4.96%
Median
2.38%
Q1
1.83%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.55% is consistent with its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
182.48%
Q3
97.89%
Median
55.48%
Q1
31.63%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PAC

71.16%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
206.16%
Q3
111.39%
Median
71.16%
Q1
37.58%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.16% is within the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMMPAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.83%2.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.27%71.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMM

21.49

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
45.17
Q3
25.68
Median
15.16
Q1
8.58
Min
0.79

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 21.49 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAC

19.58

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
33.87
Q3
28.56
Median
17.26
Q1
11.95
Min
6.33

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 19.58 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMM

3.44

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.15
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.09

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.44 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PAC

4.54

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
10.89
Q3
5.40
Median
3.20
Q1
1.62
Min
0.87

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MMM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
5.44
Q3
2.68
Median
0.97
Q1
0.52
Min
0.04

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PAC

9.90

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.74
Q3
3.00
Median
1.96
Q1
1.22
Min
0.38

At 9.90, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MMM vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMMPAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.4919.58
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.444.54
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.909.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)31.6918.06