Seek Returns logo

MMM vs. NSC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMM and NSC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMMMNSC
Company Name3M CompanyNorfolk Southern Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryIndustrial ConglomeratesGround Transportation
Market Capitalization83.09 billion USD67.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962June 2, 1982
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMM and NSC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMM vs. NSC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMMNSC
5-Day Price Return0.38%2.42%
13-Week Price Return1.93%17.36%
26-Week Price Return1.64%27.42%
52-Week Price Return13.02%21.89%
Month-to-Date Return-0.23%7.30%
Year-to-Date Return20.21%28.00%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.68M1.94M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.18M1.99M
3-Month Volatility22.89%18.45%
Beta1.051.34

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
13.64%
Median
9.41%
Q1
5.80%
Min
-3.73%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

NSC

23.35%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.74%
Median
9.05%
Q1
6.86%
Min
1.73%

In the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, NSC’s Return on Equity of 23.35% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MMM vs. NSC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
26.43%
Q3
13.08%
Median
9.39%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-2.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NSC

27.51%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.19%
Q3
17.08%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-5.54%

A Net Profit Margin of 27.51% places NSC in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MMM vs. NSC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
27.02%
Q3
17.23%
Median
12.90%
Q1
8.32%
Min
-3.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NSC

41.45%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
23.80%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.06%
Min
-12.94%

An Operating Profit Margin of 41.45% places NSC in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MMM vs. NSC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMMNSC
Return on Equity (TTM)91.40%23.35%
Return on Assets (TTM)9.93%7.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.01%27.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.46%41.45%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.11%51.67%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.40
Q3
1.69
Median
1.35
Q1
1.14
Min
0.56

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

NSC

0.79

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.31
Median
0.98
Q1
0.74
Min
0.35

NSC’s Current Ratio of 0.79 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MMM vs. NSC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.49
Median
0.91
Q1
0.63
Min
0.24

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

NSC

1.17

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.48
Median
1.02
Q1
0.48
Min
0.00

NSC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.17 is typical for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MMM vs. NSC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
19.80
Q3
10.68
Median
4.59
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NSC

5.21

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

NSC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.21 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MMM vs. NSC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMMNSC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.720.79
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.120.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.061.17
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-15.315.21

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMM vs. NSC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMM vs. NSC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMM

1.86%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
9.82%
Q3
5.04%
Median
3.09%
Q1
1.67%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.86% is consistent with its peers in the Industrial Conglomerates industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NSC

1.82%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.29%
Q3
2.57%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.71%
Min
0.00%

NSC’s Dividend Yield of 1.82% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM vs. NSC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
182.48%
Q3
97.89%
Median
55.48%
Q1
31.63%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NSC

36.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
75.08%
Median
41.35%
Q1
16.42%
Min
0.00%

NSC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.42% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM vs. NSC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMMNSC
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.86%1.82%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.27%36.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMM

21.10

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
45.17
Q3
25.68
Median
15.16
Q1
8.58
Min
0.79

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 21.10 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NSC

20.00

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
39.04
Q3
24.45
Median
17.51
Q1
12.92
Min
5.87

NSC’s P/E Ratio of 20.00 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM vs. NSC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMM

3.38

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.18
Q3
2.15
Median
0.69
Q1
0.41
Min
0.09

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.38 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NSC

5.50

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.22
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

With a P/S Ratio of 5.50, NSC trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MMM vs. NSC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
5.44
Q3
2.68
Median
0.97
Q1
0.52
Min
0.04

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NSC

3.90

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.27
Q3
3.03
Median
1.40
Q1
1.18
Min
0.67

NSC’s P/B Ratio of 3.90 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MMM vs. NSC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Industrial Conglomerates and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMMNSC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.1020.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.385.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)18.903.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)31.1133.09