MMM vs. NOC: 3M vs. Northrop Grumman Stock Comparison
How do 3M (MMM) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
3M (MMM) and Northrop Grumman (NOC) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but MMM is classified in Industrial Conglomerates while NOC is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | MMM | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | 3M Company | Northrop Grumman Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Industrial Conglomerates | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Industrial Conglomerates | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 95.67 billion USD | 74.59 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 2, 1962 | December 31, 1981 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | MMM | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 16.26% | -3.34% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 38.64% | 7.23% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.14% | 9.98% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports a negative beta of -0.12, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. 3M (MMM) has a non-negative beta of 0.97.
| Metric | MMM | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 27.61% | 28.86% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | -0.12 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -48.86% | -37.80% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.14M | 902.47K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | MMM | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.43 | -0.26 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.70 | -0.37 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but 3M (MMM) at 72.97% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 26.07% also sits in the top quartile.
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
72.97%
- MMM
- 72.97%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
26.07%
- Max
- 40.55%
- NOC
- 26.07%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
3M (MMM) at 14.01% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 10.37%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
14.01%
- Max
- 27.47%
- MMM
- 14.01%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
10.37%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- NOC
- 10.37%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
3M (MMM) at 23.69% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 12.91%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
23.69%
- Max
- 36.60%
- MMM
- 23.69%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
12.91%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- NOC
- 12.91%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | MMM | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 72.97% | 26.07% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.22% | 7.11% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 14.01% | 10.37% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 23.69% | 12.91% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 39.53% | 20.03% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.24% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while 3M (MMM) at 1.52% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both 3M (MMM) at -20.53% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.61% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | MMM | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 1.52% | 2.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -1.57% | 4.65% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -20.53% | 2.61% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -16.16% | -2.60% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both 3M (MMM) at 1.41 and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.23 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
1.41
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- MMM
- 1.41
- Min
- 0.36
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.23
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- NOC
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 0.93 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while 3M (MMM) at 3.04 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
3.04
- MMM
- 3.04
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
0.93
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- NOC
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | MMM | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 1.23 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 3.04 | 0.93 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.26 | 1.87 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both 3M (MMM) at 1.64% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.82% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
1.64%
- Max
- 2.66%
- MMM
- 1.64%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.82%
- Max
- 2.66%
- NOC
- 1.82%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both 3M (MMM) at 45.82% and Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 30.18% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
45.82%
- Max
- 67.39%
- MMM
- 45.82%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
30.18%
- Max
- 67.39%
- NOC
- 30.18%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | MMM | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.64% | 1.82% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 45.82% | 30.18% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 16.57 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while 3M (MMM) at 27.63 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for NOC, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
27.63
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- MMM
- 27.63
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
16.57
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- NOC
- 16.57
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.71 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while 3M (MMM) at 3.79 sits in the pricier quartile — MMM costs more per dollar of sales.
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
3.79
- Max
- 7.54
- MMM
- 3.79
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.71
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- NOC
- 1.71
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 3.99 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while 3M (MMM) at 23.18 prices above its benchmark range — MMM looks rich relative to book.
MMM
Capital Goods industry group
23.18
- MMM
- 23.18
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
3.99
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- NOC
- 3.99
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MMM | NOC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 27.63 | 16.57 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.79 | 1.71 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 23.18 | 3.99 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 6.66% | 4.21% |