Seek Returns logo

MMC vs. RKT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMC and RKT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMMCRKT
Company NameMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.Rocket Companies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryInsuranceFinancial Services
Market Capitalization98.96 billion USD41.35 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973August 6, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMC and RKT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMC vs. RKT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMCRKT
5-Day Price Return0.94%-1.07%
13-Week Price Return-7.83%36.67%
26-Week Price Return-15.61%46.60%
52-Week Price Return-10.01%2.38%
Month-to-Date Return-2.08%9.06%
Year-to-Date Return-5.12%72.11%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.35M24.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.32M19.44M
3-Month Volatility15.54%60.55%
Beta0.802.25

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMC

29.03%

Insurance Industry

Max
30.96%
Q3
18.76%
Median
14.22%
Q1
10.34%
Min
1.73%

In the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, MMC’s Return on Equity of 29.03% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

RKT has a negative Return on Equity of -0.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MMC vs. RKT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMC

16.00%

Insurance Industry

Max
26.78%
Q3
14.69%
Median
9.87%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-3.51%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.00% places MMC in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

RKT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.01%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MMC vs. RKT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMC

23.58%

Insurance Industry

Max
34.52%
Q3
20.17%
Median
14.46%
Q1
9.62%
Min
-2.51%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

RKT

13.77%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

RKT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.77% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MMC vs. RKT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMCRKT
Return on Equity (TTM)29.03%-0.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.44%0.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.00%-0.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.58%13.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)----

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMC

1.20

Insurance Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.37
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

RKT

0.40

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MMC vs. RKT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMC

1.25

Insurance Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.65
Median
0.34
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

RKT

2.69

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

MMC vs. RKT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMC

10.06

Insurance Industry

Max
43.68
Q3
21.45
Median
9.67
Q1
3.55
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

RKT

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

MMC vs. RKT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMCRKT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.200.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.200.40
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.252.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.062.42

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMC vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMC vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMC

1.63%

Insurance Industry

Max
9.80%
Q3
5.18%
Median
3.58%
Q1
2.07%
Min
0.00%

MMC’s Dividend Yield of 1.63% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RKT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MMC vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMC

39.18%

Insurance Industry

Max
169.40%
Q3
85.57%
Median
53.26%
Q1
23.68%
Min
0.00%

MMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.18% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RKT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MMC vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMCRKT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.63%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.18%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMC

24.03

Insurance Industry

Max
30.75
Q3
18.11
Median
12.67
Q1
9.66
Min
2.87

A P/E Ratio of 24.03 places MMC in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

RKT

--

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

P/E Ratio data for RKT is currently unavailable.

MMC vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMC

3.84

Insurance Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
1.88
Median
1.22
Q1
0.80
Min
0.23

With a P/S Ratio of 3.84, MMC trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Insurance industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

RKT

8.10

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

MMC vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMC

6.83

Insurance Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.56
Median
1.88
Q1
1.20
Min
0.17

At 6.83, MMC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Insurance industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

RKT

3.81

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

RKT’s P/B Ratio of 3.81 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MMC vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMCRKT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.03--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.848.10
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.833.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.6122.88