Seek Returns logo

MMC vs. PGR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMC and PGR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMMCPGR
Company NameMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.The Progressive Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryInsuranceInsurance
Market Capitalization102.92 billion USD146.08 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMC and PGR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMC vs. PGR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMCPGR
5-Day Price Return2.97%1.58%
13-Week Price Return-7.79%-11.08%
26-Week Price Return-7.37%-0.86%
52-Week Price Return-3.68%11.75%
Month-to-Date Return5.10%2.95%
Year-to-Date Return-1.44%4.00%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.76M2.80M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.45M3.44M
3-Month Volatility17.20%21.77%
Beta0.830.33

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMC

29.03%

Insurance Industry

Max
29.03%
Q3
18.11%
Median
13.90%
Q1
10.42%
Min
-0.64%

In the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, MMC’s Return on Equity of 29.03% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PGR

36.50%

Insurance Industry

Max
29.03%
Q3
18.11%
Median
13.90%
Q1
10.42%
Min
-0.64%

PGR’s Return on Equity of 36.50% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Insurance industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MMC vs. PGR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMC

16.00%

Insurance Industry

Max
26.78%
Q3
14.06%
Median
9.15%
Q1
5.48%
Min
-7.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.00% places MMC in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PGR

12.66%

Insurance Industry

Max
26.78%
Q3
14.06%
Median
9.15%
Q1
5.48%
Min
-7.05%

PGR’s Net Profit Margin of 12.66% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Insurance industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MMC vs. PGR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMC

23.58%

Insurance Industry

Max
35.49%
Q3
19.49%
Median
14.35%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

PGR

16.28%

Insurance Industry

Max
35.49%
Q3
19.49%
Median
14.35%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

MMC vs. PGR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMCPGR
Return on Equity (TTM)29.03%36.50%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.44%9.53%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.00%12.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.58%16.28%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)----

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMC

1.20

Insurance Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.33
Median
0.55
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PGR

0.08

Insurance Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.33
Median
0.55
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MMC vs. PGR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMC

1.25

Insurance Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.65
Median
0.34
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

PGR

0.21

Insurance Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.65
Median
0.34
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

MMC vs. PGR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMC

10.06

Insurance Industry

Max
43.68
Q3
20.84
Median
9.56
Q1
3.34
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

PGR

39.40

Insurance Industry

Max
43.68
Q3
20.84
Median
9.56
Q1
3.34
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

MMC vs. PGR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMCPGR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.200.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.200.04
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.250.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.0639.40

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMC vs. PGR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMC vs. PGR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMC

1.58%

Insurance Industry

Max
8.23%
Q3
4.54%
Median
3.42%
Q1
1.97%
Min
0.00%

MMC’s Dividend Yield of 1.58% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PGR

1.97%

Insurance Industry

Max
8.23%
Q3
4.54%
Median
3.42%
Q1
1.97%
Min
0.00%

PGR’s Dividend Yield of 1.97% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MMC vs. PGR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMC

39.18%

Insurance Industry

Max
168.02%
Q3
85.57%
Median
50.71%
Q1
22.04%
Min
0.00%

MMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.18% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PGR

27.53%

Insurance Industry

Max
168.02%
Q3
85.57%
Median
50.71%
Q1
22.04%
Min
0.00%

PGR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.53% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMC vs. PGR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMCPGR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.58%1.97%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.18%27.53%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMC

24.83

Insurance Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
17.76
Median
13.63
Q1
10.02
Min
2.89

A P/E Ratio of 24.83 places MMC in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PGR

13.97

Insurance Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
17.76
Median
13.63
Q1
10.02
Min
2.89

PGR’s P/E Ratio of 13.97 is within the middle range for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMC vs. PGR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMC

3.97

Insurance Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
0.81
Min
0.23

With a P/S Ratio of 3.97, MMC trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Insurance industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PGR

1.77

Insurance Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
0.81
Min
0.23

PGR’s P/S Ratio of 1.77 aligns with the market consensus for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MMC vs. PGR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMC

6.83

Insurance Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
2.48
Median
1.68
Q1
1.19
Min
0.19

At 6.83, MMC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Insurance industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PGR

4.80

Insurance Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
2.48
Median
1.68
Q1
1.19
Min
0.19

At 4.80, PGR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Insurance industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MMC vs. PGR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Insurance industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMCPGR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.8313.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.971.77
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.834.80
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.238.85