MMC vs. NWG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 18, 2025

Here’s a clear look at MMC and NWG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MMC is a standard domestic listing, while NWG trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	MMC	NWG
Company Name	Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.	NatWest Group plc
Country	United States	United Kingdom
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Insurance	Banks
Market Capitalization	102.92 billion USD	59.86 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 21, 1973	October 18, 2007
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMC and NWG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMC vs. NWG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	MMC	NWG
5-Day Price Return	2.97%	2.09%
13-Week Price Return	-7.79%	9.60%
26-Week Price Return	-7.37%	19.80%
52-Week Price Return	-3.68%	57.68%
Month-to-Date Return	5.10%	1.82%
Year-to-Date Return	-1.44%	33.45%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.76M	9.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.45M	21.35M
3-Month Volatility	17.20%	24.94%
Beta	0.83	1.46

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMC

29.03%

Insurance Industry

Max: 29.03%
Q3: 18.11%
Median: 13.90%
Q1: 10.42%
Min: -0.64%

In the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, MMC’s Return on Equity of 29.03% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

NWG

13.01%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

NWG’s Return on Equity of 13.01% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MMC vs. NWG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMC

16.00%

Insurance Industry

Max: 26.78%
Q3: 14.06%
Median: 9.15%
Q1: 5.48%
Min: -7.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.00% places MMC in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NWG

31.24%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

NWG’s Net Profit Margin of 31.24% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MMC vs. NWG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMC

23.58%

Insurance Industry

Max: 35.49%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 14.35%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

NWG

40.79%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

NWG’s Operating Profit Margin of 40.79% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MMC vs. NWG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	MMC	NWG
Return on Equity (TTM)	29.03%	13.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)	7.44%	0.73%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	16.00%	31.24%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	23.58%	40.79%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMC

1.20

Insurance Industry

Max: 2.97
Q3: 1.33
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.15
Min: 0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

NWG

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MMC vs. NWG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMC

1.25

Insurance Industry

Max: 1.25
Q3: 0.65
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.22
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

NWG

2.77

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

MMC vs. NWG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMC

10.06

Insurance Industry

Max: 43.68
Q3: 20.84
Median: 9.56
Q1: 3.34
Min: -5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

NWG

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

MMC vs. NWG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	MMC	NWG
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.20	--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.20	--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.25	2.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	10.06	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMC vs. NWG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMC vs. NWG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMC

1.58%

Insurance Industry

Max: 8.23%
Q3: 4.54%
Median: 3.42%
Q1: 1.97%
Min: 0.00%

MMC’s Dividend Yield of 1.58% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

NWG

0.00%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

NWG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MMC vs. NWG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMC

39.18%

Insurance Industry

Max: 168.02%
Q3: 85.57%
Median: 50.71%
Q1: 22.04%
Min: 0.00%

MMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.18% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NWG

48.52%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

NWG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 48.52% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMC vs. NWG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	MMC	NWG
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.58%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	39.18%	48.52%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMC

24.83

Insurance Industry

Max: 28.91
Q3: 17.76
Median: 13.63
Q1: 10.02
Min: 2.89

A P/E Ratio of 24.83 places MMC in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

NWG

8.25

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

NWG’s P/E Ratio of 8.25 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMC vs. NWG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMC

3.97

Insurance Industry

Max: 3.72
Q3: 1.98
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.23

With a P/S Ratio of 3.97, MMC trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Insurance industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NWG

1.17

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

MMC vs. NWG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMC

6.83

Insurance Industry

Max: 4.37
Q3: 2.48
Median: 1.68
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.19

At 6.83, MMC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Insurance industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NWG

0.99

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

NWG’s P/B Ratio of 0.99 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MMC vs. NWG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	MMC	NWG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	24.83	8.25
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	3.97	1.17
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	6.83	0.99
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	19.23	8.47