Seek Returns logo

MMC vs. NMR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MMC and NMR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MMC is a standard domestic listing, while NMR trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMMCNMR
Company NameMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.Nomura Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryInsuranceCapital Markets
Market Capitalization103.84 billion USD21.30 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973December 17, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MMC and NMR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MMC vs. NMR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMMCNMR
5-Day Price Return2.04%1.08%
13-Week Price Return-8.90%25.44%
26-Week Price Return-8.61%3.96%
52-Week Price Return-5.36%23.08%
Month-to-Date Return6.03%7.16%
Year-to-Date Return-0.56%15.64%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.11M10.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.33M12.60M
3-Month Volatility16.42%20.12%
Beta0.831.48

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MMC

29.03%

Insurance Industry

Max
29.03%
Q3
18.11%
Median
13.90%
Q1
10.42%
Min
-0.64%

In the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, MMC’s Return on Equity of 29.03% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

NMR

9.87%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

NMR’s Return on Equity of 9.87% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MMC vs. NMR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MMC

16.00%

Insurance Industry

Max
26.78%
Q3
14.06%
Median
9.15%
Q1
5.48%
Min
-7.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.00% places MMC in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NMR

7.19%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, NMR’s Net Profit Margin of 7.19% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MMC vs. NMR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MMC

23.58%

Insurance Industry

Max
35.49%
Q3
19.49%
Median
14.35%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

NMR

9.96%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

NMR’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.96% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MMC vs. NMR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMMCNMR
Return on Equity (TTM)29.03%9.87%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.44%0.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)16.00%7.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)23.58%9.96%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--39.95%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MMC

1.20

Insurance Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.33
Median
0.55
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

NMR

0.23

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MMC vs. NMR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MMC

1.25

Insurance Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.65
Median
0.34
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

NMR

10.44

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

MMC vs. NMR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MMC

10.06

Insurance Industry

Max
43.68
Q3
20.84
Median
9.56
Q1
3.34
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

NMR

--

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

MMC vs. NMR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMMCNMR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.200.23
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.200.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.2510.44
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.06--

Growth

Revenue Growth

MMC vs. NMR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MMC vs. NMR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MMC

1.56%

Insurance Industry

Max
8.23%
Q3
4.54%
Median
3.42%
Q1
1.97%
Min
0.00%

MMC’s Dividend Yield of 1.56% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

NMR

3.55%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

NMR’s Dividend Yield of 3.55% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMC vs. NMR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MMC

39.18%

Insurance Industry

Max
168.02%
Q3
85.57%
Median
50.71%
Q1
22.04%
Min
0.00%

MMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.18% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NMR

66.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

NMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 66.06% is within the typical range for the Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMC vs. NMR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMMCNMR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.56%3.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.18%66.06%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MMC

25.14

Insurance Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
17.76
Median
13.63
Q1
10.02
Min
2.89

A P/E Ratio of 25.14 places MMC in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

NMR

9.31

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, NMR’s P/E Ratio of 9.31 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MMC vs. NMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MMC

4.02

Insurance Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
0.81
Min
0.23

With a P/S Ratio of 4.02, MMC trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Insurance industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NMR

0.67

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, NMR’s P/S Ratio of 0.67 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MMC vs. NMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MMC

6.83

Insurance Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
2.48
Median
1.68
Q1
1.19
Min
0.19

At 6.83, MMC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Insurance industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NMR

0.83

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

NMR’s P/B Ratio of 0.83 is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MMC vs. NMR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMMCNMR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.149.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.020.67
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.830.83
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.463.32