Seek Returns logo

MGM vs. TPR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MGM and TPR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMGMTPR
Company NameMGM Resorts InternationalTapestry, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization10.38 billion USD20.49 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 2, 1988October 6, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MGM and TPR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MGM vs. TPR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMGMTPR
5-Day Price Return3.84%0.56%
13-Week Price Return21.59%24.66%
26-Week Price Return-0.57%10.38%
52-Week Price Return-1.60%145.13%
Month-to-Date Return4.58%-8.85%
Year-to-Date Return10.01%50.73%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.71M5.20M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.95M4.09M
3-Month Volatility35.33%46.48%
Beta1.711.62

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MGM

17.86%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

MGM’s Return on Equity of 17.86% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TPR

10.99%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
53.33%
Q3
26.13%
Median
18.47%
Q1
7.99%
Min
-10.49%

TPR’s Return on Equity of 10.99% is on par with the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MGM vs. TPR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MGM

3.13%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, MGM’s Net Profit Margin of 3.13% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TPR

2.61%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
23.35%
Q3
13.49%
Median
8.45%
Q1
4.18%
Min
-3.90%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Net Profit Margin of 2.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MGM vs. TPR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MGM

8.11%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

MGM’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.11% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TPR

4.21%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
13.00%
Q1
7.02%
Min
-3.59%

TPR’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MGM vs. TPR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMGMTPR
Return on Equity (TTM)17.86%10.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.28%2.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.13%2.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.11%4.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)44.95%75.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MGM

1.22

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

MGM’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TPR

1.87

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
3.91
Q3
2.49
Median
1.89
Q1
1.43
Min
0.80

TPR’s Current Ratio of 1.87 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MGM vs. TPR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MGM

2.18

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

MGM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.18 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TPR

2.79

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.67
Q3
1.29
Median
0.59
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.79, TPR operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MGM vs. TPR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MGM

3.29

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

MGM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.29 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TPR

3.53

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
35.85
Median
9.20
Q1
4.29
Min
-32.49

In the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.53 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MGM vs. TPR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMGMTPR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.221.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.021.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.182.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)3.293.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

MGM vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MGM vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MGM

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MGM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TPR

1.46%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
6.59%
Q3
3.60%
Median
2.59%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Yield of 1.46% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MGM vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MGM

0.09%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MGM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.09% is within the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TPR

35.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
195.44%
Q3
106.47%
Median
58.77%
Q1
36.52%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.71% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MGM vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMGMTPR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.09%35.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MGM

18.45

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

MGM’s P/E Ratio of 18.45 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TPR

111.89

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
63.29
Q3
34.64
Median
18.01
Q1
13.88
Min
6.04

At 111.89, TPR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MGM vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MGM

0.58

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, MGM’s P/S Ratio of 0.58 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TPR

2.92

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.46
Q3
3.13
Median
1.72
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

TPR’s P/S Ratio of 2.92 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MGM vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MGM

3.15

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

MGM’s P/B Ratio of 3.15 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TPR

21.26

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.76
Q3
6.00
Median
3.26
Q1
1.97
Min
0.69

At 21.26, TPR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MGM vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMGMTPR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.45111.89
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.582.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.1521.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.6919.15