MGA vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 25, 2025

Here’s a clear look at MGA and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MGA is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	MGA	VIPS
Company Name	Magna International Inc.	Vipshop Holdings Limited
Country	Canada	China
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Automobile Components	Broadline Retail
Market Capitalization	12.98 billion USD	8.51 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	October 5, 1984	March 23, 2012
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MGA and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MGA vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	MGA	VIPS
5-Day Price Return	4.79%	2.62%
13-Week Price Return	28.83%	19.53%
26-Week Price Return	17.96%	17.18%
52-Week Price Return	14.01%	35.91%
Month-to-Date Return	12.14%	14.38%
Year-to-Date Return	6.06%	28.14%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.80M	2.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.49M	3.20M
3-Month Volatility	27.68%	27.56%
Beta	1.09	0.71

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 22.61%
Q3: 12.61%
Median: 8.05%
Q1: 4.99%
Min: -4.24%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 49.17%
Q3: 28.98%
Median: 19.22%
Q1: 10.86%
Min: -11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MGA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 14.35%
Q3: 7.20%
Median: 5.37%
Q1: 2.20%
Min: -3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 19.78%
Q3: 11.90%
Median: 8.63%
Q1: 5.21%
Min: 0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MGA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 18.98%
Q3: 10.24%
Median: 7.27%
Q1: 4.13%
Min: 0.23%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 27.23%
Q3: 15.96%
Median: 11.13%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: 1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MGA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	MGA	VIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)	10.10%	18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)	3.76%	10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	2.91%	6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	4.33%	8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	13.83%	23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 4.06
Q3: 2.51
Median: 1.80
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 3.54
Q3: 2.42
Median: 1.49
Q1: 1.22
Min: 0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MGA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 1.25
Q3: 0.63
Median: 0.37
Q1: 0.18
Min: 0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 2.14
Q3: 1.34
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MGA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 88.53
Q3: 38.84
Median: 11.36
Q1: 5.08
Min: -21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 37.34
Q3: 20.63
Median: 11.28
Q1: 4.22
Min: -19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MGA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	MGA	VIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.16	1.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.80	1.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.48	0.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	8.66	150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

MGA vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MGA vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MGA

4.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 6.03%
Q3: 3.38%
Median: 2.62%
Q1: 1.38%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.35%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 5.46%
Q3: 2.38%
Median: 0.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MGA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 95.56%
Q3: 55.95%
Median: 37.10%
Q1: 27.90%
Min: 0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 131.17%
Q3: 63.48%
Median: 29.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MGA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	MGA	VIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	4.35%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	44.88%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MGA

10.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 26.62
Q3: 17.42
Median: 13.22
Q1: 11.14
Min: 2.52

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 10.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VIPS

7.97

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 66.12
Q3: 35.17
Median: 16.29
Q1: 10.47
Min: 5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MGA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MGA

0.30

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 1.81
Q3: 0.97
Median: 0.71
Q1: 0.38
Min: 0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.30 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

VIPS

0.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 5.40
Q3: 3.33
Median: 2.04
Q1: 0.80
Min: 0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.55 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MGA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 2.49
Q3: 1.49
Median: 0.93
Q1: 0.78
Min: 0.40

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 9.06
Q3: 5.22
Median: 3.48
Q1: 1.90
Min: 0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MGA vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	MGA	VIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	10.33	7.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.30	0.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	0.85	1.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	6.83	--