Seek Returns logo

MGA vs. TPR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MGA and TPR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMGATPR
Company NameMagna International Inc.Tapestry, Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization13.86 billion USD23.91 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 5, 1984October 6, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MGA and TPR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MGA vs. TPR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMGATPR
5-Day Price Return4.54%2.00%
13-Week Price Return22.04%24.89%
26-Week Price Return39.73%58.44%
52-Week Price Return24.82%152.44%
Month-to-Date Return3.64%2.00%
Year-to-Date Return13.75%76.78%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.81M2.86M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.12M3.89M
3-Month Volatility20.84%43.60%
Beta1.071.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.51%
Median
7.91%
Q1
5.60%
Min
-2.27%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TPR

10.99%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

TPR’s Return on Equity of 10.99% is on par with the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MGA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
13.51%
Q3
7.21%
Median
5.02%
Q1
2.32%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TPR

2.61%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, TPR’s Net Profit Margin of 2.61% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MGA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.92%
Q3
10.29%
Median
6.94%
Q1
3.64%
Min
-0.31%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TPR

4.21%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

TPR’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.21% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MGA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMGATPR
Return on Equity (TTM)10.10%10.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.76%2.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.91%2.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.33%4.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)13.83%75.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.36
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TPR

1.87

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

TPR’s Current Ratio of 1.87 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MGA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.68
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TPR

2.79

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

TPR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.79. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MGA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
35.45
Median
11.20
Q1
4.03
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TPR

3.53

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

TPR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MGA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMGATPR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.161.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.801.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.482.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.663.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

MGA vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MGA vs. TPR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MGA

3.94%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
5.41%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.23%
Q1
1.18%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.94%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TPR

1.23%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Yield of 1.23% is consistent with its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MGA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
60.04%
Median
39.38%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TPR

35.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

TPR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.71% is within the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MGA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMGATPR
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.94%1.23%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)44.88%35.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MGA

11.38

Automobile Components Industry

Max
32.42
Q3
21.41
Median
15.09
Q1
13.02
Min
2.51

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 11.38 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TPR

132.74

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

At 132.74, TPR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MGA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MGA

0.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.13
Median
0.78
Q1
0.39
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.33 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TPR

3.47

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

TPR’s P/S Ratio of 3.47 is in the upper echelon for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MGA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.57
Q3
1.91
Median
1.08
Q1
0.78
Min
0.46

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TPR

21.26

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

At 21.26, TPR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MGA vs. TPR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMGATPR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.38132.74
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.333.47
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.8521.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.5322.72