Seek Returns logo

MGA vs. TCOM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MGA and TCOM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MGA is a standard domestic listing, while TCOM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMGATCOM
Company NameMagna International Inc.Trip.com Group Limited
CountryCanadaSingapore
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsHotels, Restaurants & Leisure
Market Capitalization12.54 billion USD41.94 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateOctober 5, 1984December 9, 2003
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MGA and TCOM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MGA vs. TCOM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMGATCOM
5-Day Price Return-0.60%2.73%
13-Week Price Return20.18%0.10%
26-Week Price Return10.53%-4.48%
52-Week Price Return9.35%24.59%
Month-to-Date Return8.47%1.73%
Year-to-Date Return2.58%-7.31%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.92M2.87M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.51M2.54M
3-Month Volatility27.61%27.28%
Beta1.081.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TCOM

12.21%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

TCOM’s Return on Equity of 12.21% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MGA vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TCOM

32.02%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

TCOM’s Net Profit Margin of 32.02% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MGA vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TCOM

26.60%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.60% places TCOM in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MGA vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMGATCOM
Return on Equity (TTM)10.10%12.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.76%6.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.91%32.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.33%26.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)13.83%81.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TCOM

1.46

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

TCOM’s Current Ratio of 1.46 aligns with the median group of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MGA vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TCOM

0.29

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

TCOM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.29 is typical for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MGA vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TCOM

9.43

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

TCOM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.43 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MGA vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMGATCOM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.161.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.801.19
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.480.29
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.669.43

Growth

Revenue Growth

MGA vs. TCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MGA vs. TCOM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MGA

4.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.35%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TCOM

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TCOM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MGA vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TCOM

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TCOM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MGA vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMGATCOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.35%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)44.88%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MGA

10.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 10.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TCOM

17.95

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

TCOM’s P/E Ratio of 17.95 is within the middle range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MGA vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MGA

0.30

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.30 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TCOM

5.74

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

TCOM’s P/S Ratio of 5.74 is in the upper echelon for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MGA vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TCOM

2.13

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

TCOM’s P/B Ratio of 2.13 is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MGA vs. TCOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMGATCOM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.3317.95
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.305.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.852.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.83--