MGA vs. SW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 3, 2025

Here’s a clear look at MGA and SW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	MGA	SW
Company Name	Magna International Inc.	Smurfit Westrock Plc
Country	Canada	Ireland
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Materials
GICS Industry	Automobile Components	Containers & Packaging
Market Capitalization	13.38 billion USD	22.27 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	October 5, 1984	June 17, 2008
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MGA and SW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MGA vs. SW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	MGA	SW
5-Day Price Return	3.06%	-1.57%
13-Week Price Return	25.19%	-1.34%
26-Week Price Return	22.63%	-5.99%
52-Week Price Return	18.85%	-15.01%
Month-to-Date Return	4.60%	-10.11%
Year-to-Date Return	9.75%	-20.96%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.07M	4.96M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.14M	3.86M
3-Month Volatility	25.24%	32.95%
Beta	1.01	1.08

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 22.61%
Q3: 12.51%
Median: 7.91%
Q1: 5.60%
Min: -2.27%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SW

2.94%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 36.99%
Q3: 19.86%
Median: 10.47%
Q1: 6.76%
Min: -0.20%

SW’s Return on Equity of 2.94% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MGA vs. SW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 13.51%
Q3: 7.21%
Median: 5.02%
Q1: 2.32%
Min: -3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SW

1.18%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 10.84%
Q3: 8.25%
Median: 4.91%
Q1: 3.65%
Min: -0.12%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Net Profit Margin of 1.18% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MGA vs. SW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 18.92%
Q3: 10.29%
Median: 6.94%
Q1: 3.64%
Min: -0.31%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SW

4.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 22.03%
Q3: 13.09%
Median: 8.06%
Q1: 6.46%
Min: -0.07%

SW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.20% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MGA vs. SW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	MGA	SW
Return on Equity (TTM)	10.10%	2.94%
Return on Assets (TTM)	3.76%	1.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	2.91%	1.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	4.33%	4.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	13.83%	19.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 4.13
Q3: 2.54
Median: 1.80
Q1: 1.36
Min: 0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SW

1.45

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 1.96
Q3: 1.45
Median: 1.33
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.87

SW’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MGA vs. SW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 1.34
Q3: 0.68
Median: 0.38
Q1: 0.21
Min: 0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SW

0.79

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.15
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.20
Q1: 0.53
Min: 0.23

SW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MGA vs. SW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 80.10
Q3: 35.45
Median: 11.20
Q1: 4.03
Min: -21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SW

2.41

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 13.16
Q3: 8.10
Median: 3.38
Q1: 2.83
Min: 1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MGA vs. SW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	MGA	SW
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.16	1.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.80	0.95
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.48	0.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	8.66	2.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

MGA vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MGA vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MGA

4.08%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 5.41%
Q3: 3.10%
Median: 2.23%
Q1: 1.18%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.08%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

SW

3.45%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 7.14%
Q3: 4.65%
Median: 3.69%
Q1: 2.00%
Min: 0.00%

SW’s Dividend Yield of 3.45% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MGA vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 99.04%
Q3: 60.04%
Median: 39.38%
Q1: 27.41%
Min: 0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SW

85.87%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 222.75%
Q3: 132.16%
Median: 65.79%
Q1: 28.53%
Min: 0.00%

SW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MGA vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	MGA	SW
Dividend Yield (TTM)	4.08%	3.45%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	44.88%	85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MGA

11.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 32.42
Q3: 21.41
Median: 15.09
Q1: 13.02
Min: 2.51

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 11.00 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SW

42.29

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 24.22
Q3: 20.28
Median: 17.07
Q1: 15.06
Min: 7.79

At 42.29, SW’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MGA vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MGA

0.32

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 2.20
Q3: 1.13
Median: 0.78
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.09

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.32 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SW

0.50

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 1.99
Q3: 1.17
Median: 0.94
Q1: 0.55
Min: 0.31

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s P/S Ratio of 0.50 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MGA vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 3.57
Q3: 1.91
Median: 1.08
Q1: 0.78
Min: 0.46

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SW

1.23

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max: 4.79
Q3: 3.32
Median: 2.14
Q1: 1.60
Min: 0.89

SW’s P/B Ratio of 1.23 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MGA vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	MGA	SW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	11.00	42.29
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.32	0.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	0.85	1.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	7.27	42.78