Seek Returns logo

MGA vs. SN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MGA and SN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMGASN
Company NameMagna International Inc.SharkNinja, Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsHousehold Durables
Market Capitalization13.81 billion USD12.29 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 5, 1984July 31, 2023
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MGA and SN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MGA vs. SN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMGASN
5-Day Price Return-0.06%-7.11%
13-Week Price Return11.54%-25.99%
26-Week Price Return35.42%-13.97%
52-Week Price Return11.13%-13.78%
Month-to-Date Return3.98%2.97%
Year-to-Date Return14.68%-9.57%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.30M2.62M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.01M1.73M
3-Month Volatility26.93%38.02%
Beta1.061.50

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MGA

8.55%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.69%
Q3
11.79%
Median
7.47%
Q1
4.51%
Min
-2.79%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 8.55% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SN

26.77%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.77%
Q3
17.22%
Median
11.18%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-7.31%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, SN’s Return on Equity of 26.77% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MGA vs. SN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

2.47%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.12%
Q3
7.20%
Median
4.94%
Q1
1.95%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.47% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SN

9.45%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.03%
Q3
9.13%
Median
6.61%
Q1
3.40%
Min
-4.24%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.45% places SN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MGA vs. SN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

3.77%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
19.04%
Q3
10.47%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.48%
Min
-2.44%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.77% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SN

12.84%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.79%
Q3
12.10%
Median
9.44%
Q1
5.22%
Min
-3.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 12.84% places SN in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MGA vs. SN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMGASN
Return on Equity (TTM)8.55%26.77%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.20%12.72%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.47%9.45%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.77%12.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)13.85%48.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

1.18

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.42
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.18 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SN

1.96

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.43
Q3
3.68
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.75

SN’s Current Ratio of 1.96 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MGA vs. SN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.43

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.66
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.43 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SN

0.31

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.77
Q3
0.83
Median
0.34
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

SN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MGA vs. SN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
36.86
Median
11.36
Q1
4.46
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SN

9.98

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

SN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.98 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MGA vs. SN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMGASN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.181.96
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.811.16
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.430.31
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.669.98

Growth

Revenue Growth

MGA vs. SN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MGA vs. SN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MGA

3.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
3.13%
Median
2.50%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.91%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

SN

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.27%
Q3
3.94%
Median
1.84%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

SN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MGA vs. SN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MGA

52.47%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
62.52%
Median
37.81%
Q1
27.27%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 52.47% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SN

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
154.55%
Q3
65.87%
Median
40.54%
Q1
6.74%
Min
0.00%

SN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MGA vs. SN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMGASN
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.91%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)52.47%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MGA

13.40

Automobile Components Industry

Max
28.01
Q3
22.74
Median
15.58
Q1
12.96
Min
2.71

MGA’s P/E Ratio of 13.40 is within the middle range for the Automobile Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SN

20.78

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.05
Q3
20.97
Median
12.60
Q1
9.92
Min
6.71

SN’s P/E Ratio of 20.78 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MGA vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MGA

0.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.05
Q3
1.12
Median
0.78
Q1
0.46
Min
0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.33 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SN

1.96

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.31
Median
0.86
Q1
0.56
Min
0.15

SN’s P/S Ratio of 1.96 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MGA vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

1.05

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.68
Q3
2.06
Median
1.25
Q1
0.90
Min
0.46

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 1.05 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SN

6.05

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.77
Q3
2.08
Median
1.44
Q1
1.07
Min
0.58

At 6.05, SN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MGA vs. SN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Household Durables industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMGASN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)13.4020.78
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.331.96
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.056.05
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.2222.94