Seek Returns logo

MGA vs. ROL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MGA and ROL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMGAROL
Company NameMagna International Inc.Rollins, Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization13.38 billion USD28.32 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 5, 1984March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MGA and ROL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MGA vs. ROL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMGAROL
5-Day Price Return3.06%4.69%
13-Week Price Return25.19%4.11%
26-Week Price Return22.63%10.73%
52-Week Price Return18.85%17.60%
Month-to-Date Return4.60%3.89%
Year-to-Date Return9.75%26.73%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.07M2.16M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.14M1.65M
3-Month Volatility25.24%20.04%
Beta1.010.72

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.51%
Median
7.91%
Q1
5.60%
Min
-2.27%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ROL

35.93%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

ROL’s Return on Equity of 35.93% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MGA vs. ROL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
13.51%
Q3
7.21%
Median
5.02%
Q1
2.32%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

ROL

13.70%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.70% places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MGA vs. ROL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.92%
Q3
10.29%
Median
6.94%
Q1
3.64%
Min
-0.31%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ROL

19.14%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.14% places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MGA vs. ROL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMGAROL
Return on Equity (TTM)10.10%35.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.76%16.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.91%13.70%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.33%19.14%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)13.83%52.69%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.36
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

ROL

0.68

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

ROL’s Current Ratio of 0.68 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MGA vs. ROL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.68
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ROL

0.38

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

ROL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.38 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MGA vs. ROL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
35.45
Median
11.20
Q1
4.03
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

ROL

23.77

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

ROL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.77 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MGA vs. ROL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMGAROL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.160.68
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.800.63
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.480.38
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.6623.77

Growth

Revenue Growth

MGA vs. ROL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MGA vs. ROL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MGA

4.08%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
5.41%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.23%
Q1
1.18%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.08%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

ROL

1.12%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

ROL’s Dividend Yield of 1.12% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MGA vs. ROL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
60.04%
Median
39.38%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

ROL

63.80%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

ROL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 63.80% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MGA vs. ROL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMGAROL
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.08%1.12%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)44.88%63.80%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MGA

11.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
32.42
Q3
21.41
Median
15.09
Q1
13.02
Min
2.51

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 11.00 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

ROL

56.92

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

A P/E Ratio of 56.92 places ROL in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MGA vs. ROL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MGA

0.32

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.13
Median
0.78
Q1
0.39
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.32 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

ROL

7.80

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

With a P/S Ratio of 7.80, ROL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MGA vs. ROL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.57
Q3
1.91
Median
1.08
Q1
0.78
Min
0.46

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

ROL

18.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

At 18.94, ROL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MGA vs. ROL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMGAROL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.0056.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.327.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.8518.94
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.2744.10