Seek Returns logo

MGA vs. RL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MGA and RL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMGARL
Company NameMagna International Inc.Ralph Lauren Corporation
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
Market Capitalization13.02 billion USD19.93 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 5, 1984June 12, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MGA and RL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MGA vs. RL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMGARL
5-Day Price Return-1.77%2.06%
13-Week Price Return16.30%13.24%
26-Week Price Return31.24%66.27%
52-Week Price Return16.37%68.26%
Month-to-Date Return-1.44%4.93%
Year-to-Date Return8.17%42.45%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.86M0.55M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.07M0.66M
3-Month Volatility23.32%28.36%
Beta1.071.57

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.51%
Median
7.91%
Q1
5.60%
Min
-2.27%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RL

31.52%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
42.05%
Q3
24.41%
Median
17.18%
Q1
7.87%
Min
-8.23%

In the upper quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, RL’s Return on Equity of 31.52% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MGA vs. RL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
13.51%
Q3
7.21%
Median
5.02%
Q1
2.32%
Min
-3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RL

10.91%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
21.16%
Q3
13.26%
Median
6.06%
Q1
3.93%
Min
-3.05%

RL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MGA vs. RL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.92%
Q3
10.29%
Median
6.94%
Q1
3.64%
Min
-0.31%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RL

13.69%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
29.47%
Q3
20.87%
Median
11.68%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.12%

RL’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.69% is around the midpoint for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MGA vs. RL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMGARL
Return on Equity (TTM)10.10%31.52%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.76%11.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.91%10.91%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.33%13.69%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)13.83%69.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.36
Min
0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RL

1.84

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.94
Q3
2.22
Median
1.61
Q1
1.48
Min
0.74

RL’s Current Ratio of 1.84 aligns with the median group of the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MGA vs. RL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.68
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RL

0.75

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
2.79
Q3
1.32
Median
0.60
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

RL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.75 is typical for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MGA vs. RL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
35.45
Median
11.20
Q1
4.03
Min
-21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RL

85.38

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
57.00
Q3
32.83
Median
7.87
Q1
3.52
Min
-32.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 85.38, RL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MGA vs. RL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMGARL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.161.84
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.801.25
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.480.75
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.6685.38

Growth

Revenue Growth

MGA vs. RL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MGA vs. RL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MGA

4.14%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
5.41%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.23%
Q1
1.18%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.14%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

RL

1.03%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
5.22%
Q3
3.07%
Median
2.34%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

RL’s Dividend Yield of 1.03% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MGA vs. RL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
60.04%
Median
39.38%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RL

25.71%

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
156.63%
Q3
94.60%
Median
52.65%
Q1
35.04%
Min
0.00%

RL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.71% is in the lower quartile for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MGA vs. RL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMGARL
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.14%1.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)44.88%25.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MGA

10.83

Automobile Components Industry

Max
32.42
Q3
21.41
Median
15.09
Q1
13.02
Min
2.51

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 10.83 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RL

25.00

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
48.15
Q3
33.82
Median
20.70
Q1
14.57
Min
7.12

RL’s P/E Ratio of 25.00 is within the middle range for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MGA vs. RL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MGA

0.32

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.13
Median
0.78
Q1
0.39
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.32 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RL

2.73

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
4.35
Q3
3.06
Median
1.66
Q1
0.83
Min
0.26

RL’s P/S Ratio of 2.73 aligns with the market consensus for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MGA vs. RL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.57
Q3
1.91
Median
1.08
Q1
0.78
Min
0.46

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RL

6.61

Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods Industry

Max
9.74
Q3
5.59
Median
3.41
Q1
2.01
Min
0.56

RL’s P/B Ratio of 6.61 is in the upper tier for the Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MGA vs. RL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMGARL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.8325.00
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.322.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.856.61
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.1619.50