MGA vs. PDD: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 23, 2025

Here’s a clear look at MGA and PDD, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MGA is a standard domestic listing, while PDD trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	MGA	PDD
Company Name	Magna International Inc.	PDD Holdings Inc.
Country	Canada	Ireland
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Automobile Components	Broadline Retail
Market Capitalization	12.54 billion USD	167.52 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	October 5, 1984	July 26, 2018
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MGA and PDD by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MGA vs. PDD: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	MGA	PDD
5-Day Price Return	-0.60%	2.84%
13-Week Price Return	20.18%	-0.38%
26-Week Price Return	10.53%	-2.91%
52-Week Price Return	9.35%	-21.91%
Month-to-Date Return	8.47%	4.01%
Year-to-Date Return	2.58%	21.66%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.92M	6.23M
3-Month Avg. Volume	1.51M	7.76M
3-Month Volatility	27.61%	38.70%
Beta	1.08	0.39

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MGA

10.10%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 22.61%
Q3: 12.61%
Median: 8.05%
Q1: 4.99%
Min: -4.24%

MGA’s Return on Equity of 10.10% is on par with the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PDD

33.75%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 49.17%
Q3: 28.98%
Median: 19.22%
Q1: 10.86%
Min: -11.14%

In the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, PDD’s Return on Equity of 33.75% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MGA vs. PDD: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

2.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 14.35%
Q3: 7.20%
Median: 5.37%
Q1: 2.20%
Min: -3.89%

MGA’s Net Profit Margin of 2.91% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Automobile Components industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PDD

24.63%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 19.78%
Q3: 11.90%
Median: 8.63%
Q1: 5.21%
Min: 0.82%

PDD’s Net Profit Margin of 24.63% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MGA vs. PDD: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MGA

4.33%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 18.98%
Q3: 10.24%
Median: 7.27%
Q1: 4.13%
Min: 0.23%

MGA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.33% is around the midpoint for the Automobile Components industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PDD

24.47%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 27.23%
Q3: 15.96%
Median: 11.13%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: 1.77%

An Operating Profit Margin of 24.47% places PDD in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MGA vs. PDD: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	MGA	PDD
Return on Equity (TTM)	10.10%	33.75%
Return on Assets (TTM)	3.76%	20.50%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	2.91%	24.63%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	4.33%	24.47%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	13.83%	59.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

1.16

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 4.06
Q3: 2.51
Median: 1.80
Q1: 1.47
Min: 0.79

MGA’s Current Ratio of 1.16 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

PDD

2.27

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 3.54
Q3: 2.42
Median: 1.49
Q1: 1.22
Min: 0.67

PDD’s Current Ratio of 2.27 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MGA vs. PDD: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.48

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 1.25
Q3: 0.63
Median: 0.37
Q1: 0.18
Min: 0.00

MGA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.48 is typical for the Automobile Components industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PDD

0.02

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 2.14
Q3: 1.34
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.27
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, PDD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.02 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MGA vs. PDD: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MGA

8.66

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 88.53
Q3: 38.84
Median: 11.36
Q1: 5.08
Min: -21.51

MGA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.66 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Automobile Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PDD

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 37.34
Q3: 20.63
Median: 11.28
Q1: 4.22
Min: -19.29

Interest Coverage Ratio data for PDD is currently unavailable.

MGA vs. PDD: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	MGA	PDD
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.16	2.27
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.80	2.25
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.48	0.02
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	8.66	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

MGA vs. PDD: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MGA vs. PDD: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MGA

4.35%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 6.03%
Q3: 3.38%
Median: 2.62%
Q1: 1.38%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.35%, MGA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobile Components industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

PDD

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 5.46%
Q3: 2.38%
Median: 0.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PDD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MGA vs. PDD: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MGA

44.88%

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 95.56%
Q3: 55.95%
Median: 37.10%
Q1: 27.90%
Min: 0.00%

MGA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.88% is within the typical range for the Automobile Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PDD

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 131.17%
Q3: 63.48%
Median: 29.43%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PDD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MGA vs. PDD: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	MGA	PDD
Dividend Yield (TTM)	4.35%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	44.88%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MGA

10.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 26.62
Q3: 17.42
Median: 13.22
Q1: 11.14
Min: 2.52

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/E Ratio of 10.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

PDD

11.97

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 66.12
Q3: 35.17
Median: 16.29
Q1: 10.47
Min: 5.94

PDD’s P/E Ratio of 11.97 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MGA vs. PDD: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MGA

0.30

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 1.81
Q3: 0.97
Median: 0.71
Q1: 0.38
Min: 0.08

In the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MGA’s P/S Ratio of 0.30 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PDD

2.95

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 5.40
Q3: 3.33
Median: 2.04
Q1: 0.80
Min: 0.16

PDD’s P/S Ratio of 2.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MGA vs. PDD: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MGA

0.85

Automobile Components Industry

Max: 2.49
Q3: 1.49
Median: 0.93
Q1: 0.78
Min: 0.40

MGA’s P/B Ratio of 0.85 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PDD

3.58

Broadline Retail Industry

Max: 9.06
Q3: 5.22
Median: 3.48
Q1: 1.90
Min: 0.74

PDD’s P/B Ratio of 3.58 is within the conventional range for the Broadline Retail industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MGA vs. PDD: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	MGA	PDD
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	10.33	11.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.30	2.95
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	0.85	3.58
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	6.83	10.20