Seek Returns logo

MET vs. SF: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MET and SF, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMETSF
Company NameMetLife, Inc.Stifel Financial Corp.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryInsuranceCapital Markets
Market Capitalization54.55 billion USD11.42 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 5, 2000July 19, 1983
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MET and SF by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MET vs. SF: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMETSF
5-Day Price Return0.86%-0.32%
13-Week Price Return4.84%2.98%
26-Week Price Return8.06%29.90%
52-Week Price Return-1.17%16.69%
Month-to-Date Return-0.41%-1.53%
Year-to-Date Return0.18%5.33%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.89M0.83M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.16M0.73M
3-Month Volatility20.99%22.14%
Beta0.771.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MET

15.11%

Insurance Industry

Max
30.96%
Q3
18.76%
Median
14.22%
Q1
10.34%
Min
1.73%

MET’s Return on Equity of 15.11% is on par with the norm for the Insurance industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SF

10.91%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
22.24%
Median
13.52%
Q1
8.61%
Min
-4.25%

SF’s Return on Equity of 10.91% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MET vs. SF: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MET

5.87%

Insurance Industry

Max
26.78%
Q3
14.69%
Median
9.87%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-3.51%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance industry, MET’s Net Profit Margin of 5.87% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

SF

10.13%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
69.91%
Q3
37.24%
Median
24.30%
Q1
13.06%
Min
-15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, SF’s Net Profit Margin of 10.13% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MET vs. SF: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MET

9.33%

Insurance Industry

Max
34.52%
Q3
20.17%
Median
14.46%
Q1
9.62%
Min
-2.51%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

SF

12.61%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
84.86%
Q3
47.16%
Median
32.23%
Q1
18.65%
Min
-21.87%

SF’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.61% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MET vs. SF: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMETSF
Return on Equity (TTM)15.11%10.91%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.62%1.54%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.87%10.13%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)9.33%12.61%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--98.89%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MET

0.04

Insurance Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.37
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

SF

0.10

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.81
Median
1.01
Q1
0.56
Min
0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MET vs. SF: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MET

0.72

Insurance Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.65
Median
0.34
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

SF

5.52

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
2.79
Median
0.96
Q1
0.28
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

MET vs. SF: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MET

6.12

Insurance Industry

Max
43.68
Q3
21.45
Median
9.67
Q1
3.55
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

SF

2.08

Capital Markets Industry

Max
107.59
Q3
48.41
Median
10.85
Q1
4.56
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

MET vs. SF: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMETSF
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.040.10
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.040.10
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.725.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)6.122.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

MET vs. SF: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MET vs. SF: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MET

3.11%

Insurance Industry

Max
9.80%
Q3
5.18%
Median
3.58%
Q1
2.07%
Min
0.00%

MET’s Dividend Yield of 3.11% is consistent with its peers in the Insurance industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SF

2.07%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.02%
Q3
4.54%
Median
2.55%
Q1
1.27%
Min
0.00%

SF’s Dividend Yield of 2.07% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MET vs. SF: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MET

39.96%

Insurance Industry

Max
169.40%
Q3
85.57%
Median
53.26%
Q1
23.68%
Min
0.00%

MET’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.96% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SF

39.56%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
199.38%
Q3
99.28%
Median
60.67%
Q1
32.00%
Min
0.00%

SF’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.56% is within the typical range for the Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MET vs. SF: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMETSF
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.11%2.07%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)39.96%39.56%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MET

12.84

Insurance Industry

Max
30.75
Q3
18.11
Median
12.67
Q1
9.66
Min
2.87

MET’s P/E Ratio of 12.84 is within the middle range for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SF

19.09

Capital Markets Industry

Max
51.69
Q3
29.42
Median
17.58
Q1
12.55
Min
5.59

SF’s P/E Ratio of 19.09 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MET vs. SF: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MET

0.75

Insurance Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
1.88
Median
1.22
Q1
0.80
Min
0.23

In the lower quartile for the Insurance industry, MET’s P/S Ratio of 0.75 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SF

1.93

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.65
Q3
7.29
Median
4.53
Q1
2.26
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, SF’s P/S Ratio of 1.93 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MET vs. SF: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MET

1.95

Insurance Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.56
Median
1.88
Q1
1.20
Min
0.17

MET’s P/B Ratio of 1.95 is within the conventional range for the Insurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SF

1.91

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.83
Q3
5.12
Median
2.66
Q1
1.19
Min
0.37

SF’s P/B Ratio of 1.91 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MET vs. SF: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMETSF
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.8419.09
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.751.93
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.951.91
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)3.618.01