Seek Returns logo

MELI vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MELI and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MELI is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMELIVIPS
Company NameMercadoLibre, Inc.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryUruguayChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryBroadline RetailBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization122.35 billion USD8.31 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateAugust 10, 2007March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MELI and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MELI vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMELIVIPS
5-Day Price Return3.25%-0.59%
13-Week Price Return-5.55%19.66%
26-Week Price Return6.79%14.46%
52-Week Price Return20.39%33.92%
Month-to-Date Return1.67%11.73%
Year-to-Date Return41.93%25.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.30M2.89M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.35M3.13M
3-Month Volatility26.55%27.89%
Beta1.510.71

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MELI

43.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

In the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, MELI’s Return on Equity of 43.06% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MELI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MELI

8.52%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

MELI’s Net Profit Margin of 8.52% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MELI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MELI

12.30%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

MELI’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.30% is around the midpoint for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MELI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMELIVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)43.06%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.57%10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)8.52%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.30%8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)45.87%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MELI

1.20

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

MELI’s Current Ratio of 1.20 falls into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MELI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MELI

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

MELI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.28 is typical for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MELI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MELI

13.22

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

MELI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.22 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MELI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMELIVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.201.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.181.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.280.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.22150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

MELI vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MELI vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MELI

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MELI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MELI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MELI

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MELI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MELI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMELIVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MELI

58.41

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

A P/E Ratio of 58.41 places MELI in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

VIPS

7.97

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MELI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MELI

4.98

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

MELI’s P/S Ratio of 4.98 is in the upper echelon for the Broadline Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

VIPS

0.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.55 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MELI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MELI

23.19

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

At 23.19, MELI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Broadline Retail industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MELI vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Broadline Retail industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMELIVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)58.417.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.980.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)23.191.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.24--