Seek Returns logo

MDU vs. MMM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MDU and MMM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMDUMMM
Company NameMDU Resources Group, Inc.3M Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringIndustrial Conglomerates
Market Capitalization3.34 billion USD83.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MDU and MMM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MDU vs. MMM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMDUMMM
5-Day Price Return-0.43%0.98%
13-Week Price Return-3.32%4.05%
26-Week Price Return-3.09%3.76%
52-Week Price Return19.64%21.19%
Month-to-Date Return-5.33%4.44%
Year-to-Date Return-9.38%20.73%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.67M2.99M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.46M3.40M
3-Month Volatility23.96%23.22%
Beta0.761.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MDU

7.68%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

MDU’s Return on Equity of 7.68% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MMM

91.40%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
21.93%
Q3
14.23%
Median
7.81%
Q1
5.91%
Min
-3.58%

MMM’s Return on Equity of 91.40% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MDU vs. MMM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MDU

11.67%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

MDU’s Net Profit Margin of 11.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MMM

16.01%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
18.70%
Q3
12.58%
Median
9.26%
Q1
3.87%
Min
-2.26%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.01% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MDU vs. MMM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MDU

17.78%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

MDU’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.78% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

MMM

19.46%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
25.69%
Q3
17.03%
Median
12.85%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-0.73%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.46% places MMM in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MDU vs. MMM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMDUMMM
Return on Equity (TTM)7.68%91.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.96%9.93%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.67%16.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.78%19.46%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-136.39%41.11%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MDU

0.74

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

MDU’s Current Ratio of 0.74 falls into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MMM

1.72

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.64
Median
1.38
Q1
1.13
Min
0.61

MMM’s Current Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MDU vs. MMM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MDU

0.80

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

MDU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MMM

3.06

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
2.27
Q3
1.47
Median
0.99
Q1
0.66
Min
0.21

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.06, MMM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Industrial Conglomerates industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MDU vs. MMM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MDU

2.94

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MDU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.94 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MMM

-15.31

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
11.17
Q3
8.02
Median
5.88
Q1
2.73
Min
-2.15

MMM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -15.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MDU vs. MMM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMDUMMM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.741.72
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.601.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.803.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.94-15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

MDU vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MDU vs. MMM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MDU

3.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

MDU’s Dividend Yield of 3.09% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MMM

1.88%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
10.17%
Q3
5.53%
Median
3.14%
Q1
1.88%
Min
0.00%

MMM’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is in the lower quartile for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MDU vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MDU

48.53%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

MDU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 48.53% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MMM

39.27%

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
181.91%
Q3
95.57%
Median
50.60%
Q1
35.01%
Min
1.76%

MMM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.27% is within the typical range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MDU vs. MMM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMDUMMM
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.09%1.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)48.53%39.27%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MDU

15.71

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

MDU’s P/E Ratio of 15.71 is within the middle range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MMM

20.92

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
36.98
Q3
22.09
Median
12.18
Q1
8.93
Min
5.63

MMM’s P/E Ratio of 20.92 is within the middle range for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MDU vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MDU

1.83

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

MDU’s P/S Ratio of 1.83 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MMM

3.35

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
3.60
Q3
2.10
Median
0.68
Q1
0.42
Min
0.11

MMM’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MDU vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MDU

1.25

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

MDU’s P/B Ratio of 1.25 is within the conventional range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MMM

18.90

Industrial Conglomerates Industry

Max
4.89
Q3
2.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.60
Min
0.27

At 18.90, MMM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MDU vs. MMM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Industrial Conglomerates industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMDUMMM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.7120.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.833.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.2518.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.0530.86