Seek Returns logo

MDT vs. UHS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MDT and UHS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMDTUHS
Company NameMedtronic plcUniversal Health Services, Inc.
CountryIrelandUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization119.44 billion USD11.75 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 2, 1973July 9, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MDT and UHS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MDT vs. UHS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMDTUHS
5-Day Price Return1.35%3.33%
13-Week Price Return7.19%-6.16%
26-Week Price Return1.11%1.03%
52-Week Price Return9.90%-18.82%
Month-to-Date Return3.30%10.96%
Year-to-Date Return16.70%2.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.16M0.73M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.63M0.89M
3-Month Volatility19.48%31.65%
Beta0.791.30

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MDT

9.62%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

MDT’s Return on Equity of 9.62% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UHS

18.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, UHS’s Return on Equity of 18.62% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MDT vs. UHS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MDT

13.90%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.90% places MDT in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UHS

7.66%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.66% places UHS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MDT vs. UHS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MDT

17.76%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

MDT’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.76% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UHS

10.99%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

An Operating Profit Margin of 10.99% places UHS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MDT vs. UHS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMDTUHS
Return on Equity (TTM)9.62%18.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.16%8.60%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.90%7.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.76%10.99%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.39%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MDT

1.85

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

MDT’s Current Ratio of 1.85 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UHS

1.29

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

UHS’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MDT vs. UHS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MDT

0.59

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

MDT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UHS

0.65

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

UHS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MDT vs. UHS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MDT

10.20

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

MDT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UHS

9.05

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

UHS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.05 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MDT vs. UHS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMDTUHS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.851.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.421.19
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.590.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.209.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

MDT vs. UHS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MDT vs. UHS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MDT

3.01%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.01%, MDT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

UHS

0.45%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UHS’s Dividend Yield of 0.45% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MDT vs. UHS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MDT

76.98%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MDT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 76.98% is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

UHS

4.19%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UHS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.19% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MDT vs. UHS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMDTUHS
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.01%0.45%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)76.98%4.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MDT

25.55

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, MDT’s P/E Ratio of 25.55 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

UHS

9.33

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, UHS’s P/E Ratio of 9.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MDT vs. UHS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MDT

3.55

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

MDT’s P/S Ratio of 3.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UHS

0.71

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

UHS’s P/S Ratio of 0.71 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MDT vs. UHS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MDT

2.25

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

MDT’s P/B Ratio of 2.25 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

UHS

1.66

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

UHS’s P/B Ratio of 1.66 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MDT vs. UHS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMDTUHS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.559.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.550.71
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.251.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.9713.05