Seek Returns logo

MDT vs. TEM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MDT and TEM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMDTTEM
Company NameMedtronic plcTempus AI, Inc.
CountryIrelandUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization125.32 billion USD15.92 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 2, 1973June 14, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MDT and TEM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MDT vs. TEM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMDTTEM
5-Day Price Return3.97%16.66%
13-Week Price Return10.53%50.34%
26-Week Price Return8.72%90.01%
52-Week Price Return9.63%78.85%
Month-to-Date Return2.58%13.57%
Year-to-Date Return22.31%171.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.63M9.06M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.60M10.97M
3-Month Volatility18.03%64.26%
Beta0.753.22

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MDT

9.62%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.93%
Q3
16.99%
Median
9.28%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-12.52%

MDT’s Return on Equity of 9.62% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TEM

-107.12%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.51%
Median
6.47%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

TEM has a negative Return on Equity of -107.12%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MDT vs. TEM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MDT

13.63%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
24.41%
Q3
13.71%
Median
10.08%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-5.58%

MDT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.63% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TEM

-20.98%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
32.18%
Q3
18.30%
Median
10.19%
Q1
4.20%
Min
-2.05%

TEM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -20.98%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MDT vs. TEM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MDT

17.90%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
18.11%
Median
15.07%
Q1
8.48%
Min
-0.28%

MDT’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.90% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TEM

-24.66%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
38.39%
Q3
21.40%
Median
13.57%
Q1
8.38%
Min
-3.51%

TEM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -24.66%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MDT vs. TEM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMDTTEM
Return on Equity (TTM)9.62%-107.12%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.14%-15.77%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.63%-20.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.90%-24.66%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.38%60.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MDT

2.01

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.00
Median
2.13
Q1
1.44
Min
0.86

MDT’s Current Ratio of 2.01 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TEM

1.54

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
3.46
Q3
2.78
Median
1.91
Q1
1.53
Min
0.43

TEM’s Current Ratio of 1.54 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MDT vs. TEM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MDT

0.60

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.76
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

MDT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TEM

2.58

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.35
Q3
0.74
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.58, TEM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MDT vs. TEM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MDT

10.20

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
56.35
Q3
25.56
Median
9.60
Q1
3.78
Min
-26.49

MDT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TEM

-14.08

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
45.00
Q3
27.84
Median
7.16
Q1
2.12
Min
-14.08

TEM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -14.08. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MDT vs. TEM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMDTTEM
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.011.54
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.501.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.602.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.20-14.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

MDT vs. TEM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MDT vs. TEM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MDT

2.89%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.15%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.89%, MDT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.41%
Q3
0.65%
Median
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MDT vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MDT

77.27%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
66.60%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MDT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 77.27% is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
113.14%
Q3
61.34%
Median
17.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MDT vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMDTTEM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.89%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)77.27%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MDT

26.71

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
67.29
Q3
47.01
Median
30.94
Q1
23.91
Min
10.79

MDT’s P/E Ratio of 26.71 is within the middle range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TEM

--

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
75.35
Q3
51.00
Median
32.93
Q1
25.27
Min
1.43

P/E Ratio data for TEM is currently unavailable.

MDT vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MDT

3.64

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.49
Q3
5.41
Median
2.86
Q1
2.07
Min
0.74

MDT’s P/S Ratio of 3.64 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TEM

16.73

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
10.49
Q3
6.43
Median
4.66
Q1
2.88
Min
1.08

With a P/S Ratio of 16.73, TEM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MDT vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MDT

2.49

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
6.56
Median
3.53
Q1
2.36
Min
0.71

MDT’s P/B Ratio of 2.49 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TEM

35.53

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
6.69
Q3
5.00
Median
3.46
Q1
2.38
Min
0.93

At 35.53, TEM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MDT vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMDTTEM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.71--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.6416.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.4935.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.47--