Seek Returns logo

MDT vs. RGC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MDT and RGC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMDTRGC
Company NameMedtronic plcRegencell Bioscience Holdings Limited
CountryIrelandHong Kong
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization119.44 billion USD6.10 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqCM
Listing DateMay 2, 1973July 16, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MDT and RGC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MDT vs. RGC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMDTRGC
5-Day Price Return1.35%-7.08%
13-Week Price Return7.19%20.60%
26-Week Price Return1.11%12,370.00%
52-Week Price Return9.90%5,568.18%
Month-to-Date Return3.30%-5.53%
Year-to-Date Return16.70%9,492.31%
10-Day Avg. Volume9.16M0.26M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.63M2.29M
3-Month Volatility19.48%644.75%
Beta0.792.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MDT

9.62%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

MDT’s Return on Equity of 9.62% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RGC

-54.75%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

RGC has a negative Return on Equity of -54.75%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MDT vs. RGC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MDT

13.90%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.90% places MDT in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

RGC

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

Net Profit Margin data for RGC is currently unavailable.

MDT vs. RGC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MDT

17.76%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

MDT’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.76% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RGC

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

Operating Profit Margin data for RGC is currently unavailable.

MDT vs. RGC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMDTRGC
Return on Equity (TTM)9.62%-54.75%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.16%-51.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.90%--
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.76%--
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.39%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MDT

1.85

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

MDT’s Current Ratio of 1.85 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

RGC

42.68

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

RGC’s Current Ratio of 42.68 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MDT vs. RGC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MDT

0.59

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

MDT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RGC

0.00

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, RGC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MDT vs. RGC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MDT

10.20

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

MDT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RGC

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

Interest Coverage Ratio data for RGC is currently unavailable.

MDT vs. RGC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMDTRGC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.8542.68
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.4241.89
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.590.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.20--

Growth

Revenue Growth

MDT vs. RGC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MDT vs. RGC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MDT

3.01%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.01%, MDT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

RGC

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

RGC currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MDT vs. RGC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MDT

76.98%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MDT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 76.98% is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

RGC

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

RGC has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MDT vs. RGC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMDTRGC
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.01%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)76.98%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MDT

25.55

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, MDT’s P/E Ratio of 25.55 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RGC

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for RGC is currently unavailable.

MDT vs. RGC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MDT

3.55

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

MDT’s P/S Ratio of 3.55 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RGC

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

P/S Ratio data for RGC is currently unavailable.

MDT vs. RGC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MDT

2.25

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

MDT’s P/B Ratio of 2.25 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

RGC

9.57

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

RGC’s P/B Ratio of 9.57 is in the upper tier for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MDT vs. RGC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMDTRGC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.55--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.55--
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.259.57
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.97--