Seek Returns logo

MDT vs. PHG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MDT and PHG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MDT is a standard domestic stock, while PHG trades as New York Registered Shares, providing U.S. investors with a way to invest in the foreign-based company.

SymbolMDTPHG
Company NameMedtronic plcKoninklijke Philips N.V.
CountryIrelandNetherlands
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
Market Capitalization125.32 billion USD26.62 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMay 2, 1973March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockNY Reg Shrs

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MDT and PHG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MDT vs. PHG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMDTPHG
5-Day Price Return3.97%2.74%
13-Week Price Return10.53%16.41%
26-Week Price Return8.72%0.64%
52-Week Price Return9.63%-18.72%
Month-to-Date Return2.58%2.52%
Year-to-Date Return22.31%-3.20%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.63M1.44M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.60M1.59M
3-Month Volatility18.03%26.08%
Beta0.751.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MDT

9.62%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.93%
Q3
16.99%
Median
9.28%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-12.52%

MDT’s Return on Equity of 9.62% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PHG

-0.18%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.93%
Q3
16.99%
Median
9.28%
Q1
5.10%
Min
-12.52%

PHG has a negative Return on Equity of -0.18%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MDT vs. PHG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MDT

13.63%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
24.41%
Q3
13.71%
Median
10.08%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-5.58%

MDT’s Net Profit Margin of 13.63% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PHG

0.90%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
24.41%
Q3
13.71%
Median
10.08%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-5.58%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s Net Profit Margin of 0.90% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MDT vs. PHG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MDT

17.90%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
18.11%
Median
15.07%
Q1
8.48%
Min
-0.28%

MDT’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.90% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PHG

6.11%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
18.11%
Median
15.07%
Q1
8.48%
Min
-0.28%

PHG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.11% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MDT vs. PHG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMDTPHG
Return on Equity (TTM)9.62%-0.18%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.14%-0.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.63%0.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.90%6.11%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)65.38%43.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MDT

2.01

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.00
Median
2.13
Q1
1.44
Min
0.86

MDT’s Current Ratio of 2.01 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PHG

1.26

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.00
Median
2.13
Q1
1.44
Min
0.86

PHG’s Current Ratio of 1.26 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MDT vs. PHG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MDT

0.60

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.76
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

MDT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PHG

0.81

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.76
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

PHG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.81. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MDT vs. PHG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MDT

10.20

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
56.35
Q3
25.56
Median
9.60
Q1
3.78
Min
-26.49

MDT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PHG

1.41

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
56.35
Q3
25.56
Median
9.60
Q1
3.78
Min
-26.49

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MDT vs. PHG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMDTPHG
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.011.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.500.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.600.81
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)10.201.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

MDT vs. PHG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MDT vs. PHG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MDT

2.89%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.15%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.89%, MDT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

PHG

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.15%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG’s Dividend Yield of 0.00% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MDT vs. PHG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MDT

77.27%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
66.60%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MDT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 77.27% is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

PHG

0.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
66.60%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.42% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MDT vs. PHG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMDTPHG
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.89%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)77.27%0.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MDT

26.71

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
67.29
Q3
47.01
Median
30.94
Q1
23.91
Min
10.79

MDT’s P/E Ratio of 26.71 is within the middle range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PHG

139.46

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
67.29
Q3
47.01
Median
30.94
Q1
23.91
Min
10.79

At 139.46, PHG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MDT vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MDT

3.64

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.49
Q3
5.41
Median
2.86
Q1
2.07
Min
0.74

MDT’s P/S Ratio of 3.64 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PHG

1.26

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.49
Q3
5.41
Median
2.86
Q1
2.07
Min
0.74

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s P/S Ratio of 1.26 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MDT vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MDT

2.49

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
6.56
Median
3.53
Q1
2.36
Min
0.71

MDT’s P/B Ratio of 2.49 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PHG

1.89

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
6.56
Median
3.53
Q1
2.36
Min
0.71

PHG’s P/B Ratio of 1.89 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MDT vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMDTPHG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.71139.46
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.641.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.491.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)23.4714.60