Seek Returns logo

MDLZ vs. MO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MDLZ and MO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMDLZMO
Company NameMondelez International, Inc.Altria Group, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFood ProductsTobacco
Market Capitalization81.74 billion USD113.53 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 13, 2001January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MDLZ and MO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MDLZ vs. MO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMDLZMO
5-Day Price Return2.78%3.10%
13-Week Price Return-3.88%13.64%
26-Week Price Return3.29%26.04%
52-Week Price Return-10.89%31.68%
Month-to-Date Return-2.35%9.11%
Year-to-Date Return5.76%29.24%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.02M8.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.46M8.64M
3-Month Volatility21.74%17.70%
Beta0.470.59

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MDLZ

13.64%

Food Products Industry

Max
27.15%
Q3
15.66%
Median
10.47%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-2.46%

MDLZ’s Return on Equity of 13.64% is on par with the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MO

149.65%

Tobacco Industry

Max
49.48%
Q3
49.48%
Median
7.92%
Q1
5.28%
Min
4.04%

MO’s Return on Equity of 149.65% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MDLZ vs. MO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MDLZ

9.81%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
9.92%
Median
6.38%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-0.92%

MDLZ’s Net Profit Margin of 9.81% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Food Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MO

37.24%

Tobacco Industry

Max
21.36%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.05%
Q1
6.80%
Min
5.37%

MO’s Net Profit Margin of 37.24% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MDLZ vs. MO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MDLZ

12.44%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.27%
Median
9.73%
Q1
6.26%
Min
-0.10%

MDLZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.44% is around the midpoint for the Food Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MO

46.84%

Tobacco Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
12.68%
Median
11.00%
Q1
10.58%
Min
10.58%

MO’s Operating Profit Margin of 46.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

MDLZ vs. MO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMDLZMO
Return on Equity (TTM)13.64%149.65%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.19%25.57%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.81%37.24%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.44%46.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)32.55%61.41%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MDLZ

0.64

Food Products Industry

Max
3.80
Q3
2.40
Median
1.61
Q1
1.28
Min
0.55

MDLZ’s Current Ratio of 0.64 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MO

0.39

Tobacco Industry

Max
3.20
Q3
1.83
Median
0.83
Q1
0.72
Min
0.57

MO’s Current Ratio of 0.39 is notably low, falling beneath the typical range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests a heightened liquidity risk and could indicate potential challenges in meeting its short-term obligations.

MDLZ vs. MO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MDLZ

0.80

Food Products Industry

Max
1.87
Q3
0.90
Median
0.48
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

MDLZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80 is typical for the Food Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MO

8.67

Tobacco Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
2.19
Median
0.74
Q1
0.26
Min
0.01

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.67, MO operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Tobacco industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MDLZ vs. MO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MDLZ

13.32

Food Products Industry

Max
70.39
Q3
32.08
Median
9.51
Q1
4.55
Min
-1.69

MDLZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 13.32 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MO

36.48

Tobacco Industry

Max
36.48
Q3
28.54
Median
7.02
Q1
6.32
Min
-11.45

MO’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 36.48 is in the upper quartile for the Tobacco industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MDLZ vs. MO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMDLZMO
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.640.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.390.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.808.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)13.3236.48

Growth

Revenue Growth

MDLZ vs. MO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MDLZ vs. MO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MDLZ

2.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
7.43%
Q3
4.12%
Median
2.67%
Q1
1.57%
Min
0.00%

MDLZ’s Dividend Yield of 2.96% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MO

6.07%

Tobacco Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
6.06%
Median
5.48%
Q1
3.91%
Min
3.27%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.07%, MO offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Tobacco industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MDLZ vs. MO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MDLZ

66.77%

Food Products Industry

Max
202.50%
Q3
109.53%
Median
67.28%
Q1
39.33%
Min
0.00%

MDLZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 66.77% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MO

78.29%

Tobacco Industry

Max
77.64%
Q3
76.55%
Median
50.14%
Q1
47.08%
Min
42.39%

At 78.29%, MO’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Tobacco industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

MDLZ vs. MO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMDLZMO
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.96%6.07%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)66.77%78.29%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MDLZ

22.54

Food Products Industry

Max
35.81
Q3
22.88
Median
17.13
Q1
13.91
Min
2.77

MDLZ’s P/E Ratio of 22.54 is within the middle range for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MO

12.90

Tobacco Industry

Max
42.16
Q3
36.45
Median
20.93
Q1
10.52
Min
9.15

MO’s P/E Ratio of 12.90 is within the middle range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MDLZ vs. MO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MDLZ

2.21

Food Products Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
1.86
Median
1.14
Q1
0.68
Min
0.12

MDLZ’s P/S Ratio of 2.21 is in the upper echelon for the Food Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MO

4.80

Tobacco Industry

Max
10.48
Q3
5.39
Median
3.32
Q1
1.54
Min
0.59

MO’s P/S Ratio of 4.80 aligns with the market consensus for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MDLZ vs. MO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MDLZ

3.33

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.76
Median
1.98
Q1
1.26
Min
0.52

MDLZ’s P/B Ratio of 3.33 is in the upper tier for the Food Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MO

27.09

Tobacco Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
4.76
Median
2.18
Q1
1.70
Min
1.06

At 27.09, MO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Tobacco industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MDLZ vs. MO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Food Products and Tobacco industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMDLZMO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)22.5412.90
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.214.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.3327.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)28.6912.98