MCO vs. RKT: Moody's vs. Rocket Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Moody's (MCO) and Rocket (RKT) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but MCO is classified in Capital Markets while RKT is classified in Financial Services.

Moody's (MCO) has more than two decades of public-market history since October 31, 1994, whereas Rocket (RKT) listed on August 6, 2020 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Rocket (RKT) carries a highly aggressive beta of 2.19, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Moody's (MCO) is closer to market-like at 1.28 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Rocket (RKT) is heavily traded at around 34.27M shares per day, whereas Moody's (MCO) sees a more moderate 817.57K — larger orders in the latter may require more patience and tighter control over order sizing.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Moody's (MCO) at 76.74% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Rocket (RKT) at 7.86%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Moody's (MCO) at 35.26% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Rocket (RKT) at 11.02%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

Both Moody's (MCO) at 46.27% and Rocket (RKT) at 43.54% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Rocket (RKT) at 26.87% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Moody's (MCO) at 8.89% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for RKT.

Moody's (MCO) at 21.40% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Rocket (RKT) at -123.81% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Moody's (MCO) in Financial Services and Rocket (RKT) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Moody's (MCO) in Financial Services and Rocket (RKT) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Rocket (RKT) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Moody's (MCO) reports a yield of 0.78%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Rocket (RKT) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Moody's (MCO) reports a payout of 24.59%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Moody's (MCO) trades at 30.85 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Rocket (RKT) has no P/E ratio this period.

Rocket (RKT) at 3.61 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Moody's (MCO) at 10.66 clears its benchmark range — MCO looks notably rich on sales.

Rocket (RKT) at 1.76 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Moody's (MCO) at 26.68 prices above its benchmark range — MCO looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics