Seek Returns logo

MCK vs. VEEV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MCK and VEEV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMCKVEEV
Company NameMcKesson CorporationVeeva Systems Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesHealth Care Technology
Market Capitalization82.49 billion USD45.62 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 10, 1994October 16, 2013
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MCK and VEEV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MCK vs. VEEV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMCKVEEV
5-Day Price Return-0.01%-0.21%
13-Week Price Return-3.54%15.63%
26-Week Price Return10.57%16.60%
52-Week Price Return20.36%50.57%
Month-to-Date Return-4.38%-1.77%
Year-to-Date Return16.36%32.78%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.19M1.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.93M1.40M
3-Month Volatility21.82%42.27%
Beta0.510.97

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MCK

39.43%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

MCK’s Return on Equity of 39.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VEEV

13.74%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
47.95%
Q3
35.17%
Median
13.74%
Q1
11.05%
Min
11.05%

VEEV’s Return on Equity of 13.74% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Technology industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MCK vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MCK

0.92%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, MCK’s Net Profit Margin of 0.92% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

VEEV

27.34%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
51.50%
Q3
45.32%
Median
27.34%
Q1
14.21%
Min
14.21%

VEEV’s Net Profit Margin of 27.34% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Technology industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MCK vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MCK

1.23%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

MCK’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.23% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

VEEV

26.97%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
73.15%
Q3
56.55%
Median
26.97%
Q1
22.10%
Min
22.10%

VEEV’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.97% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Technology industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MCK vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMCKVEEV
Return on Equity (TTM)39.43%13.74%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.54%11.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.92%27.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.23%26.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)3.59%75.50%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MCK

0.90

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

MCK’s Current Ratio of 0.90 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VEEV

4.60

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
7.04
Q3
7.01
Median
4.60
Q1
2.96
Min
0.31

VEEV’s Current Ratio of 4.60 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Technology industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MCK vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MCK

1.29

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

MCK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.29. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VEEV

0.00

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
0.06
Q3
0.05
Median
0.01
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Technology industry, VEEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MCK vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MCK

17.45

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.45, MCK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

VEEV

169.00

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
224.12
Q3
222.84
Median
219.00
Q1
181.50
Min
169.00

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Technology industry, VEEV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 169.00 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MCK vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMCKVEEV
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.904.60
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.514.54
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.290.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.45169.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

MCK vs. VEEV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MCK vs. VEEV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MCK

0.42%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCK’s Dividend Yield of 0.42% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VEEV

0.00%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
1.12%
Q3
0.62%
Median
0.12%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VEEV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MCK vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MCK

10.47%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 10.47% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VEEV

0.00%

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
101.92%
Q3
72.22%
Median
42.51%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VEEV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MCK vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMCKVEEV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.42%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)10.47%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MCK

25.15

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

MCK’s P/E Ratio of 25.15 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VEEV

58.22

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
343.51
Q3
272.61
Median
54.67
Q1
36.04
Min
31.57

VEEV’s P/E Ratio of 58.22 is within the middle range for the Health Care Technology industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MCK vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MCK

0.23

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, MCK’s P/S Ratio of 0.23 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

VEEV

15.92

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
176.90
Q3
98.12
Median
16.38
Q1
4.49
Min
0.00

VEEV’s P/S Ratio of 15.92 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Technology industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MCK vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MCK

4.06

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

MCK’s P/B Ratio of 4.06 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VEEV

6.13

Health Care Technology Industry

Max
117.60
Q3
90.72
Median
8.09
Q1
3.83
Min
3.06

VEEV’s P/B Ratio of 6.13 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Technology industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MCK vs. VEEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Health Care Technology industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMCKVEEV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)25.1558.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.2315.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.066.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)8.8838.33