Seek Returns logo

MCK vs. TEVA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MCK and TEVA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MCK is a standard domestic listing, while TEVA trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMCKTEVA
Company NameMcKesson CorporationTeva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
CountryUnited StatesIsrael
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesPharmaceuticals
Market Capitalization95.16 billion USD23.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 10, 1994February 16, 1982
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MCK and TEVA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MCK vs. TEVA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMCKTEVA
5-Day Price Return1.57%5.40%
13-Week Price Return5.43%11.77%
26-Week Price Return16.52%8.00%
52-Week Price Return58.23%11.38%
Month-to-Date Return12.51%4.58%
Year-to-Date Return35.55%-20.50%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.91M1.68M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.77M1.86M
3-Month Volatility27.54%28.52%
Beta0.52-0.34

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MCK

39.43%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

MCK’s Return on Equity of 39.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TEVA

-2.58%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.85%
Q1
5.40%
Min
-10.91%

TEVA has a negative Return on Equity of -2.58%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MCK vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MCK

0.84%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, MCK’s Net Profit Margin of 0.84% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TEVA

-0.95%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
40.67%
Q3
19.07%
Median
12.31%
Q1
4.50%
Min
-9.91%

TEVA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.95%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MCK vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MCK

1.17%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

MCK’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.17% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TEVA

5.38%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.78%
Q3
23.14%
Median
16.68%
Q1
7.98%
Min
-7.13%

TEVA’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.38% is in the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MCK vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMCKTEVA
Return on Equity (TTM)39.43%-2.58%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.22%-0.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.84%-0.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.17%5.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)3.46%50.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MCK

0.88

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

MCK’s Current Ratio of 0.88 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TEVA

1.06

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.65
Q3
2.64
Median
1.85
Q1
1.26
Min
0.78

TEVA’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MCK vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MCK

1.29

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

MCK’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.29. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TEVA

2.52

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.82
Median
0.35
Q1
0.13
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.52, TEVA operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Pharmaceuticals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MCK vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MCK

17.45

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.45, MCK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

TEVA

-0.38

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
43.60
Median
9.83
Q1
2.37
Min
-42.71

TEVA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.38. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MCK vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMCKTEVA
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.881.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.480.68
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.292.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.45-0.38

Growth

Revenue Growth

MCK vs. TEVA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MCK vs. TEVA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MCK

0.37%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCK’s Dividend Yield of 0.37% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TEVA

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.14%
Q3
3.45%
Median
2.17%
Q1
0.33%
Min
0.00%

TEVA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MCK vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MCK

11.16%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.16% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TEVA

0.00%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
199.58%
Q3
97.17%
Median
53.47%
Q1
22.97%
Min
0.00%

TEVA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MCK vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMCKTEVA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.37%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)11.16%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MCK

30.35

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

A P/E Ratio of 30.35 places MCK in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TEVA

--

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
45.19
Q3
27.91
Median
20.59
Q1
15.08
Min
3.79

P/E Ratio data for TEVA is currently unavailable.

MCK vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MCK

0.25

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, MCK’s P/S Ratio of 0.25 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TEVA

1.34

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
8.87
Q3
4.56
Median
2.14
Q1
1.58
Min
0.11

In the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, TEVA’s P/S Ratio of 1.34 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MCK vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MCK

4.06

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

MCK’s P/B Ratio of 4.06 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TEVA

2.87

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.99
Median
2.48
Q1
1.53
Min
0.59

TEVA’s P/B Ratio of 2.87 is within the conventional range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MCK vs. TEVA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Pharmaceuticals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMCKTEVA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)30.35--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.251.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.062.87
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.2819.84