Seek Returns logo

MCK vs. TEM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MCK and TEM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMCKTEM
Company NameMcKesson CorporationTempus AI, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Providers & ServicesLife Sciences Tools & Services
Market Capitalization105.63 billion USD12.05 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 10, 1994June 14, 2024
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MCK and TEM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MCK vs. TEM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMCKTEM
5-Day Price Return-2.01%-4.60%
13-Week Price Return25.12%-7.18%
26-Week Price Return22.44%-0.62%
52-Week Price Return34.82%0.59%
Month-to-Date Return3.79%-23.78%
Year-to-Date Return47.76%102.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.81M7.32M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.74M8.96M
3-Month Volatility24.51%66.82%
Beta0.412.31

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MCK

39.43%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.67%
Q3
15.54%
Median
8.37%
Q1
5.49%
Min
-2.09%

MCK’s Return on Equity of 39.43% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TEM

-67.96%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
23.81%
Q3
11.79%
Median
7.51%
Q1
3.14%
Min
-6.95%

TEM has a negative Return on Equity of -67.96%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MCK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MCK

1.04%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
9.33%
Q3
4.80%
Median
2.90%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-3.28%

MCK’s Net Profit Margin of 1.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TEM

-18.45%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.77%
Q3
17.97%
Median
8.97%
Q1
3.80%
Min
-11.89%

TEM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -18.45%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MCK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MCK

1.36%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
18.35%
Q3
8.71%
Median
5.10%
Q1
2.10%
Min
-3.07%

MCK’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.36% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TEM

-23.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
31.55%
Q3
21.26%
Median
14.06%
Q1
8.54%
Min
0.11%

TEM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -23.00%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MCK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMCKTEM
Return on Equity (TTM)39.43%-67.96%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.18%-12.79%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)1.04%-18.45%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.36%-23.00%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)3.47%61.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MCK

0.88

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.56
Median
1.28
Q1
0.92
Min
0.01

MCK’s Current Ratio of 0.88 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TEM

3.28

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.87
Median
1.75
Q1
1.37
Min
0.57

TEM’s Current Ratio of 3.28 is in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MCK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MCK

1.29

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.41
Q3
1.39
Median
0.74
Q1
0.46
Min
0.00

MCK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.29 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TEM

2.45

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
0.95
Q3
0.70
Median
0.45
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.45, TEM operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MCK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MCK

17.45

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.46
Median
4.52
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.45, MCK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

TEM

-14.08

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
45.00
Q3
27.84
Median
7.16
Q1
2.12
Min
-14.08

TEM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -14.08. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MCK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMCKTEM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.883.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.483.00
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.292.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.45-14.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

MCK vs. TEM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MCK vs. TEM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MCK

0.34%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.51%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.06%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCK’s Dividend Yield of 0.34% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.02%
Q3
0.67%
Median
0.32%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MCK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MCK

8.98%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
187.56%
Q3
81.14%
Median
33.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.98% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TEM

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
97.67%
Q3
61.34%
Median
18.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MCK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMCKTEM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.34%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)8.98%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MCK

26.08

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
48.86
Q3
32.22
Median
21.78
Q1
13.97
Min
8.01

MCK’s P/E Ratio of 26.08 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TEM

--

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
78.22
Q3
57.42
Median
34.18
Q1
28.39
Min
1.55

P/E Ratio data for TEM is currently unavailable.

MCK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MCK

0.27

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.66
Q3
1.64
Median
0.72
Q1
0.27
Min
0.10

MCK’s P/S Ratio of 0.27 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TEM

10.69

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
10.69
Q3
6.37
Median
4.95
Q1
3.27
Min
1.04

TEM’s P/S Ratio of 10.69 is in the upper echelon for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MCK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MCK

4.06

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.33
Median
2.48
Q1
1.31
Min
0.65

MCK’s P/B Ratio of 4.06 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TEM

27.61

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
8.12
Q3
5.04
Median
3.94
Q1
2.12
Min
1.13

At 27.61, TEM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MCK vs. TEM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Providers & Services and Life Sciences Tools & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMCKTEM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.08--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.2710.69
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.0627.61
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.85--