MCHP vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at MCHP and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Overview
UBER’s market capitalization of 195.80 billion USD is significantly greater than MCHP’s 39.41 billion USD, highlighting its more substantial market valuation.
With betas of 1.46 for MCHP and 1.39 for UBER, both stocks show similar sensitivity to overall market movements.
| Symbol | MCHP | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Microchip Technology Incorporated | Uber Technologies, Inc. |
| Country | US | US |
| Sector | Technology | Technology |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Software - Application |
| CEO | Stephen Sanghi | Dara Khosrowshahi |
| Price | 73.06 USD | 93.63 USD |
| Market Cap | 39.41 billion USD | 195.80 billion USD |
| Beta | 1.46 | 1.39 |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NYSE |
| IPO Date | March 19, 1993 | May 10, 2019 |
| ADR | No | No |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of MCHP and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period.
Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Profitability
Return on Equity
MCHP
2.39%
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 41.84%
- Q3
- 15.81%
- Median
- 6.31%
- Q1
- -5.54%
- Min
- -30.12%
MCHP’s Return on Equity of 2.39% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
UBER
69.55%
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 59.01%
- Q3
- 17.85%
- Median
- 4.73%
- Q1
- -10.56%
- Min
- -52.94%
UBER’s Return on Equity of 69.55% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Software - Application industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.
Return on Invested Capital
MCHP
2.07%
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 30.91%
- Q3
- 11.34%
- Median
- 4.08%
- Q1
- -2.17%
- Min
- -19.59%
MCHP’s Return on Invested Capital of 2.07% is in line with the norm for the Semiconductors industry, reflecting a standard level of efficiency in generating profits from its capital base.
UBER
18.41%
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 35.07%
- Q3
- 9.72%
- Median
- 0.76%
- Q1
- -8.68%
- Min
- -34.12%
In the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, UBER’s Return on Invested Capital of 18.41% signifies a highly effective use of its capital to generate profits when compared to its peers.
Net Profit Margin
MCHP
4.49%
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 51.69%
- Q3
- 19.67%
- Median
- 8.56%
- Q1
- -5.44%
- Min
- -38.60%
MCHP’s Net Profit Margin of 4.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
UBER
27.07%
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 48.14%
- Q3
- 16.07%
- Median
- 1.83%
- Q1
- -9.60%
- Min
- -45.64%
A Net Profit Margin of 27.07% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Software - Application industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
Operating Profit Margin
MCHP
11.56%
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 58.03%
- Q3
- 22.12%
- Median
- 8.40%
- Q1
- -3.73%
- Min
- -36.14%
MCHP’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.56% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
UBER
8.49%
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 51.67%
- Q3
- 15.35%
- Median
- 1.79%
- Q1
- -12.42%
- Min
- -45.17%
UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.49% is around the midpoint for the Software - Application industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | MCHP | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 2.39% | 69.55% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 1.00% | 23.26% |
| Return on Invested Capital (TTM) | 2.07% | 18.41% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 4.49% | 27.07% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 11.56% | 8.49% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 57.32% | 39.58% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio
MCHP
2.59
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 9.10
- Q3
- 5.23
- Median
- 3.09
- Q1
- 2.49
- Min
- 1.02
MCHP’s Current Ratio of 2.59 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
UBER
1.02
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 5.09
- Q3
- 2.84
- Median
- 1.70
- Q1
- 1.12
- Min
- 0.04
UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.02 falls into the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio
MCHP
0.80
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 0.97
- Q3
- 0.46
- Median
- 0.21
- Q1
- 0.05
- Min
- 0.00
MCHP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.
UBER
0.51
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 1.85
- Q3
- 0.77
- Median
- 0.18
- Q1
- 0.05
- Min
- 0.00
UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.51 is typical for the Software - Application industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
Interest Coverage Ratio
MCHP
2.09
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 36.25
- Q3
- 29.12
- Median
- 7.01
- Q1
- -1.22
- Min
- -18.18
MCHP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.09 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
UBER
7.65
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 39.23
- Q3
- 8.55
- Median
- 1.48
- Q1
- -14.59
- Min
- -39.97
UBER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.65 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Software - Application industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | MCHP | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (TTM) | 2.59 | 1.02 |
| Quick Ratio (TTM) | 1.47 | 1.02 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (TTM) | 0.80 | 0.51 |
| Debt-to-Asset Ratio (TTM) | 0.37 | 0.21 |
| Net Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio (TTM) | 5.06 | 0.81 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 2.09 | 7.65 |
Growth
The following charts compare key year-over-year (YoY) growth metrics for MCHP and UBER. These metrics are based on the companies’ annual financial reports.
Revenue Growth
Earnings Per Share (EPS) Growth
Free Cash Flow Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield
MCHP
2.49%
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 6.48%
- Q3
- 0.93%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
With a Dividend Yield of 2.49%, MCHP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.
UBER
0.00%
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 3.66%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.
Dividend Payout Ratio
MCHP
633.16%
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 204.29%
- Q3
- 31.85%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
MCHP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 633.16% is above 100%. This means the company is paying out more in dividends than it earned, a practice that is often unsustainable and could indicate a risk to future dividend stability.
UBER
0.00%
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 81.09%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | MCHP | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.49% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 633.16% | 0.00% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio
MCHP
254.79
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 86.15
- Q3
- 47.38
- Median
- 27.87
- Q1
- 18.89
- Min
- 4.73
At 254.79, MCHP’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Semiconductors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.
UBER
15.95
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 194.31
- Q3
- 98.56
- Median
- 51.87
- Q1
- 22.76
- Min
- 1.02
In the lower quartile for the Software - Application industry, UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.95 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.
Forward P/E to Growth Ratio
MCHP
4.85
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 4.73
- Q3
- 2.80
- Median
- 1.11
- Q1
- 0.68
- Min
- 0.01
The Forward PEG Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric in the Semiconductors industry.
UBER
0.73
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 15.44
- Q3
- 6.57
- Median
- 2.78
- Q1
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.00
UBER’s Forward PEG Ratio of 0.73 is within the middle range of its peers in the Software - Application industry. This suggests a reasonable balance between the stock’s price and its expected growth, aligning with sector valuation norms.
Price-to-Sales Ratio
MCHP
11.49
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 21.96
- Q3
- 10.21
- Median
- 4.45
- Q1
- 2.32
- Min
- 0.48
MCHP’s P/S Ratio of 11.49 is in the upper echelon for the Semiconductors industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.
UBER
4.31
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 23.49
- Q3
- 11.14
- Median
- 5.62
- Q1
- 2.84
- Min
- 0.33
UBER’s P/S Ratio of 4.31 aligns with the market consensus for the Software - Application industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.
Price-to-Book Ratio
MCHP
5.55
Semiconductors Industry
- Max
- 13.12
- Q3
- 6.49
- Median
- 3.31
- Q1
- 1.74
- Min
- 0.23
MCHP’s P/B Ratio of 5.55 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.
UBER
8.92
Software - Application Industry
- Max
- 21.03
- Q3
- 10.49
- Median
- 6.36
- Q1
- 2.89
- Min
- 0.12
The P/B Ratio is often not a primary valuation metric for the Software - Application industry.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | MCHP | UBER |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (P/E, TTM) | 254.79 | 15.95 |
| Forward PEG Ratio (TTM) | 4.85 | 0.73 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (P/S, TTM) | 11.49 | 4.31 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (P/B, TTM) | 5.55 | 8.92 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (P/FCF, TTM) | 51.04 | 25.15 |
| EV-to-EBITDA (TTM) | 45.80 | 27.40 |
| EV-to-Sales (TTM) | 12.91 | 4.45 |