Seek Returns logo

MCHP vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MCHP and TTWO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMCHPTTWO
Company NameMicrochip Technology IncorporatedTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentEntertainment
Market Capitalization35.48 billion USD43.56 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 19, 1993April 15, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MCHP and TTWO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MCHP vs. TTWO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMCHPTTWO
5-Day Price Return-0.71%4.26%
13-Week Price Return7.86%4.37%
26-Week Price Return23.80%28.98%
52-Week Price Return-13.96%60.32%
Month-to-Date Return-2.72%6.02%
Year-to-Date Return14.65%28.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume11.68M2.35M
3-Month Avg. Volume10.69M2.25M
3-Month Volatility44.06%24.18%
Beta1.571.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MCHP

-0.01%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

MCHP has a negative Return on Equity of -0.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TTWO

-91.27%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -91.27%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MCHP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MCHP

-0.01%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

MCHP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.01%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

TTWO

-79.50%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -79.50%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MCHP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MCHP

6.69%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

MCHP’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.69% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-77.94%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -77.94%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MCHP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMCHPTTWO
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.01%-91.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.00%-37.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-0.01%-79.50%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.69%-77.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)56.07%55.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MCHP

2.59

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

MCHP’s Current Ratio of 2.59 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TTWO

0.78

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 0.78 falls into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MCHP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MCHP

0.80

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MCHP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TTWO

1.71

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.71, TTWO operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MCHP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MCHP

1.16

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, MCHP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.16 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MCHP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMCHPTTWO
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.590.78
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.470.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.801.71
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.16-44.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

MCHP vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MCHP vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MCHP

2.78%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.78%, MCHP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MCHP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MCHP

123.62%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCHP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 123.62% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MCHP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMCHPTTWO
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.78%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)123.62%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MCHP

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

P/E Ratio data for MCHP is currently unavailable.

TTWO

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

MCHP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MCHP

7.99

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

MCHP’s P/S Ratio of 7.99 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TTWO

7.62

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MCHP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MCHP

3.68

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

MCHP’s P/B Ratio of 3.68 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TTWO

17.11

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 17.11 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MCHP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMCHPTTWO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.997.62
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.6817.11
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)45.53190.77