Seek Returns logo

MCHP vs. NICE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MCHP and NICE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MCHP is a standard domestic listing, while NICE trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMCHPNICE
Company NameMicrochip Technology IncorporatedNICE Ltd.
CountryUnited StatesIsrael
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentSoftware
Market Capitalization34.77 billion USD8.93 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 19, 1993January 25, 1996
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MCHP and NICE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MCHP vs. NICE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMCHPNICE
5-Day Price Return-1.13%-3.82%
13-Week Price Return-10.56%-12.81%
26-Week Price Return26.23%-14.39%
52-Week Price Return-20.15%9.98%
Month-to-Date Return-0.17%5.97%
Year-to-Date Return11.79%-21.44%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.31M0.17M
3-Month Avg. Volume8.61M0.15M
3-Month Volatility34.03%33.43%
Beta1.47-0.33

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MCHP

-2.26%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

MCHP has a negative Return on Equity of -2.26%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NICE

14.85%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

NICE’s Return on Equity of 14.85% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MCHP vs. NICE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MCHP

-3.50%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

MCHP has a negative Net Profit Margin of -3.50%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NICE

18.81%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

NICE’s Net Profit Margin of 18.81% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MCHP vs. NICE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MCHP

2.54%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

MCHP’s Operating Profit Margin of 2.54% is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

NICE

21.25%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

NICE’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.25% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MCHP vs. NICE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMCHPNICE
Return on Equity (TTM)-2.26%14.85%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.96%10.16%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-3.50%18.81%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)2.54%21.25%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.48%67.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MCHP

2.31

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

MCHP’s Current Ratio of 2.31 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NICE

1.83

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

NICE’s Current Ratio of 1.83 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MCHP vs. NICE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MCHP

0.80

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MCHP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

NICE

0.12

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

NICE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MCHP vs. NICE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MCHP

1.16

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, MCHP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.16 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

NICE

37.69

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

NICE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 37.69 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MCHP vs. NICE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMCHPNICE
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.311.83
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.331.67
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.800.12
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.1637.69

Growth

Revenue Growth

MCHP vs. NICE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MCHP vs. NICE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MCHP

2.91%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.91%, MCHP offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

NICE

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NICE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MCHP vs. NICE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MCHP

123.62%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MCHP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 123.62% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

NICE

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NICE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MCHP vs. NICE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMCHPNICE
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.91%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)123.62%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MCHP

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

P/E Ratio data for MCHP is currently unavailable.

NICE

17.01

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, NICE’s P/E Ratio of 17.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MCHP vs. NICE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MCHP

8.14

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

MCHP’s P/S Ratio of 8.14 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NICE

3.20

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, NICE’s P/S Ratio of 3.20 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MCHP vs. NICE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MCHP

5.54

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

MCHP’s P/B Ratio of 5.54 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NICE

2.91

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

NICE’s P/B Ratio of 2.91 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MCHP vs. NICE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMCHPNICE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--17.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.143.20
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.542.91
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)47.5113.76