Seek Returns logo

MBLY vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MBLY and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MBLY is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMBLYVIPS
Company NameMobileye Global Inc.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryIsraelChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization11.24 billion USD8.36 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 26, 2022March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MBLY and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MBLY vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMBLYVIPS
5-Day Price Return-0.58%2.17%
13-Week Price Return-13.63%16.56%
26-Week Price Return-23.83%16.40%
52-Week Price Return-8.90%35.57%
Month-to-Date Return-3.02%12.39%
Year-to-Date Return-30.67%25.91%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.70M2.93M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.38M3.18M
3-Month Volatility51.23%27.85%
Beta0.490.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MBLY

-24.48%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MBLY has a negative Return on Equity of -24.48%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MBLY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MBLY

-153.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MBLY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -153.91%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MBLY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MBLY

-160.62%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MBLY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -160.62%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MBLY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMBLYVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)-24.48%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.52%10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-153.91%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-160.62%8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.80%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

6.91

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MBLY’s Current Ratio of 6.91 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MBLY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

0.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MBLY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MBLY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

-4.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MBLY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.33. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MBLY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMBLYVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)6.911.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)5.971.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-4.33150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

MBLY vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MBLY vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

MBLY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MBLY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MBLY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MBLY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMBLYVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

--

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

P/E Ratio data for MBLY is currently unavailable.

VIPS

7.97

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MBLY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

5.93

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 5.93, MBLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobile Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VIPS

0.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.55 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MBLY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

1.21

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MBLY’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MBLY vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMBLYVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--7.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.930.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.211.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.33--