Seek Returns logo

MBLY vs. SW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MBLY and SW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMBLYSW
Company NameMobileye Global Inc.Smurfit Westrock Plc
CountryIsraelIreland
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryMaterials
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsContainers & Packaging
Market Capitalization11.60 billion USD23.56 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 26, 2022June 17, 2008
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MBLY and SW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MBLY vs. SW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMBLYSW
5-Day Price Return1.93%3.01%
13-Week Price Return-14.21%0.27%
26-Week Price Return-13.43%-17.75%
52-Week Price Return-2.40%16.14%
Month-to-Date Return0.07%1.67%
Year-to-Date Return-28.46%-16.23%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.18M3.95M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.57M3.66M
3-Month Volatility51.78%33.88%
Beta0.491.09

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MBLY

-24.48%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.61%
Median
8.05%
Q1
4.99%
Min
-4.24%

MBLY has a negative Return on Equity of -24.48%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

SW

2.94%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
41.66%
Q3
20.76%
Median
14.35%
Q1
6.55%
Min
3.64%

A Return on Equity of 2.94% places SW below the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests challenges in efficiently using shareholder capital to generate profit, which could point to operational issues or a conservative capital structure.

MBLY vs. SW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MBLY

-153.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
7.20%
Median
5.37%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-3.89%

MBLY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -153.91%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

SW

1.18%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
11.61%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.91%
Q1
4.20%
Min
0.08%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Net Profit Margin of 1.18% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MBLY vs. SW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MBLY

-160.62%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.98%
Q3
10.24%
Median
7.27%
Q1
4.13%
Min
0.23%

MBLY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -160.62%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

SW

4.20%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
22.03%
Q3
13.17%
Median
8.87%
Q1
6.86%
Min
0.07%

SW’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.20% is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MBLY vs. SW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMBLYSW
Return on Equity (TTM)-24.48%2.94%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.52%1.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-153.91%1.18%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-160.62%4.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.80%19.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

6.91

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.51
Median
1.80
Q1
1.47
Min
0.79

MBLY’s Current Ratio of 6.91 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

SW

1.45

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.57
Median
1.27
Q1
1.13
Min
0.58

SW’s Current Ratio of 1.45 aligns with the median group of the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MBLY vs. SW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

0.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.63
Median
0.37
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MBLY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

SW

0.79

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
4.50
Q3
2.23
Median
1.22
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

SW’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Containers & Packaging industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MBLY vs. SW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

-4.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
88.53
Q3
38.84
Median
11.36
Q1
5.08
Min
-21.51

MBLY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.33. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SW

2.41

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
13.16
Q3
8.10
Median
3.61
Q1
2.94
Min
1.06

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

MBLY vs. SW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMBLYSW
Current Ratio (MRQ)6.911.45
Quick Ratio (MRQ)5.970.95
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-4.332.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

MBLY vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MBLY vs. SW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
6.03%
Q3
3.38%
Median
2.62%
Q1
1.38%
Min
0.00%

MBLY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SW

3.26%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
7.37%
Q3
4.07%
Median
3.33%
Q1
1.72%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Yield of 3.26% is consistent with its peers in the Containers & Packaging industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MBLY vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
95.56%
Q3
55.95%
Median
37.10%
Q1
27.90%
Min
0.00%

MBLY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SW

85.87%

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
221.20%
Q3
119.52%
Median
58.05%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

SW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Containers & Packaging industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MBLY vs. SW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMBLYSW
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%3.26%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

--

Automobile Components Industry

Max
26.62
Q3
17.42
Median
13.22
Q1
11.14
Min
2.52

P/E Ratio data for MBLY is currently unavailable.

SW

44.73

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
35.98
Q3
27.87
Median
16.15
Q1
14.38
Min
8.20

At 44.73, SW’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Containers & Packaging industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MBLY vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

6.10

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
0.97
Median
0.71
Q1
0.38
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 6.10, MBLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobile Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

SW

0.53

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
2.91
Q3
1.67
Median
0.83
Q1
0.64
Min
0.30

In the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry, SW’s P/S Ratio of 0.53 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MBLY vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

1.21

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.49
Median
0.93
Q1
0.78
Min
0.40

MBLY’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SW

1.23

Containers & Packaging Industry

Max
5.28
Q3
3.30
Median
2.35
Q1
1.57
Min
0.89

SW’s P/B Ratio of 1.23 is in the lower quartile for the Containers & Packaging industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MBLY vs. SW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Containers & Packaging industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMBLYSW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--44.73
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.100.53
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.211.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.8745.25