Seek Returns logo

MBLY vs. STLA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MBLY and STLA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMBLYSTLA
Company NameMobileye Global Inc.Stellantis N.V.
CountryIsraelNetherlands
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobile ComponentsAutomobiles
Market Capitalization11.27 billion USD27.85 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateOctober 26, 2022June 9, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MBLY and STLA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MBLY vs. STLA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMBLYSTLA
5-Day Price Return1.07%-3.97%
13-Week Price Return-21.47%-8.57%
26-Week Price Return-12.30%-30.98%
52-Week Price Return-1.88%-36.62%
Month-to-Date Return0.79%-3.91%
Year-to-Date Return-29.12%-37.54%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.88M33.72M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.90M23.99M
3-Month Volatility42.50%44.43%
Beta0.491.63

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MBLY

-24.48%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
22.61%
Q3
12.51%
Median
7.91%
Q1
5.60%
Min
-2.27%

MBLY has a negative Return on Equity of -24.48%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

STLA

-3.09%

Automobiles Industry

Max
28.52%
Q3
12.70%
Median
5.15%
Q1
-1.62%
Min
-18.19%

STLA has a negative Return on Equity of -3.09%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MBLY vs. STLA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MBLY

-153.91%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
13.51%
Q3
7.21%
Median
5.02%
Q1
2.32%
Min
-3.89%

MBLY has a negative Net Profit Margin of -153.91%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

STLA

-1.64%

Automobiles Industry

Max
8.82%
Q3
5.80%
Median
2.77%
Q1
-1.08%
Min
-10.15%

STLA has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.64%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MBLY vs. STLA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MBLY

-160.62%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
18.92%
Q3
10.29%
Median
6.94%
Q1
3.64%
Min
-0.31%

MBLY has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -160.62%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

STLA

-3.88%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
6.94%
Median
4.50%
Q1
-2.17%
Min
-13.85%

STLA has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.88%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MBLY vs. STLA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMBLYSTLA
Return on Equity (TTM)-24.48%-3.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.52%-1.17%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-153.91%-1.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-160.62%-3.88%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.80%7.74%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

6.91

Automobile Components Industry

Max
4.13
Q3
2.54
Median
1.80
Q1
1.36
Min
0.79

MBLY’s Current Ratio of 6.91 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobile Components industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

STLA

1.06

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.52
Median
1.29
Q1
1.09
Min
0.47

STLA’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MBLY vs. STLA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

0.00

Automobile Components Industry

Max
1.34
Q3
0.68
Median
0.38
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Automobile Components industry, MBLY’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

STLA

0.56

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.07
Q3
1.17
Median
0.60
Q1
0.30
Min
0.05

STLA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.56 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MBLY vs. STLA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

-4.33

Automobile Components Industry

Max
80.10
Q3
35.45
Median
11.20
Q1
4.03
Min
-21.51

MBLY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.33. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

STLA

37.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
37.26
Median
13.42
Q1
1.43
Min
-49.07

STLA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 37.73 is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MBLY vs. STLA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMBLYSTLA
Current Ratio (MRQ)6.911.06
Quick Ratio (MRQ)5.970.75
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-4.3337.73

Growth

Revenue Growth

MBLY vs. STLA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MBLY vs. STLA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
5.41%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.23%
Q1
1.18%
Min
0.00%

MBLY currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

STLA

6.65%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.85%
Q3
4.84%
Median
2.53%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.65%, STLA offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Automobiles industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MBLY vs. STLA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

0.00%

Automobile Components Industry

Max
99.04%
Q3
60.04%
Median
39.38%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

MBLY has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

STLA

82.70%

Automobiles Industry

Max
131.16%
Q3
60.59%
Median
36.73%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.00%

STLA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 82.70% is in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MBLY vs. STLA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMBLYSTLA
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%6.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%82.70%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

--

Automobile Components Industry

Max
32.42
Q3
21.41
Median
15.09
Q1
13.02
Min
2.51

P/E Ratio data for MBLY is currently unavailable.

STLA

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
31.95
Q3
22.20
Median
11.17
Q1
7.39
Min
4.54

P/E Ratio data for STLA is currently unavailable.

MBLY vs. STLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MBLY

6.07

Automobile Components Industry

Max
2.20
Q3
1.13
Median
0.78
Q1
0.39
Min
0.09

With a P/S Ratio of 6.07, MBLY trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobile Components industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

STLA

0.20

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.92
Median
0.47
Q1
0.24
Min
0.09

In the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry, STLA’s P/S Ratio of 0.20 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MBLY vs. STLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MBLY

1.21

Automobile Components Industry

Max
3.57
Q3
1.91
Median
1.08
Q1
0.78
Min
0.46

MBLY’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Automobile Components industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

STLA

0.34

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
1.83
Median
0.79
Q1
0.47
Min
0.18

STLA’s P/B Ratio of 0.34 is in the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MBLY vs. STLA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Automobile Components and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMBLYSTLA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.070.20
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.210.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.772.43